Convergence of a structured metapopulation model to Levins’s model

Abstract.We consider a structured metapopulation model describing the dynamics of a single species, whose members are located in separate patches that are linked through migration according to a mean field rule. Our main aim is to find conditions under which its equilibrium distribution is reasonably approximated by that of the unstructured model of Levins (1969). We do this by showing that the (positive) equilibrium distribution converges, as the carrying capacity of each population goes to infinity together with appropriate scalings on the other parameters, to a bimodal distribution, consisting of a point mass at 0, together with a positive part which is closely approximated by a shifted Poisson centred near the carrying capacity. Under this limiting régime, we also give simpler approximate formulae for the equilibrium distribution. We conclude by showing how to compute persistence regions in parameter space for the exact model, and then illustrate all our results with numerical examples. Our proofs are based on Stein’s method.

[1]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[2]  O. Diekmann,et al.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[3]  Francesca Arrigoni,et al.  Deterministic approximation of a stochastic metapopulation model , 2003, Advances in Applied Probability.

[4]  Renato Casagrandi,et al.  A persistence criterion for metapopulations. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Persistence of a Markovian population in a patchy environment , 1984 .

[6]  Renato Casagrandi,et al.  Habitat destruction, environmental catastrophes, and metapopulation extinction. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  Andrew D. Barbour,et al.  Topics in poisson approximation , 2001 .

[8]  Matthew James Keeling,et al.  Using individual‐based simulations to test the Levins metapopulation paradigm , 2002 .

[9]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[10]  Renato Casagrandi,et al.  A mesoscale approach to extinction risk in fragmented habitats , 1999, Nature.

[11]  A. Barbour,et al.  ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF A METAPOPULATION MODEL , 2003 .

[12]  J. Metz,et al.  How should we define fitness in structured metapopulation models? Including an application to the calculation of evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[14]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Single-species metapopulation dynamics: A structured model , 1992 .

[15]  M Gyllenberg,et al.  On fitness in structured metapopulations , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.