Reducing I.T. Project Management Failures: A Research Proposal

Failures rates of Information Technology (I.T.) projects remain high, even after decades of efforts to reduce them. However, most efforts to improve project success have focused on variations within the traditional project management paradigm. We argue that a root cause of high I.T. project failure rates is the traditional paradigm itself, as promulgated by, e.g., PMBOK. Discussions with an expert panel resulted in the formulation of a new paradigm described in this paper: Value-Driven Change Leadership (VDCL). This paper proposes empirical research to ascertain the role of the new paradigm in reducing I.T. project failure rates. The initial phase of our research, reported in this paper, resulted in a survey questionnaire and pilot data from several I.T. projects. The paper describes the research methodology for an empirical study to investigate the role of VDCL in reducing I.T. project failure rates.

[1]  Tony Murphy,et al.  Achieving Business Value from Technology: A Practical Guide for Today's Executive , 2002 .

[2]  Kweku Ewusi-Mensah,et al.  Software development failures : anatomy of abandoned projects , 2003 .

[3]  Joseph W. Weiss,et al.  360-Degree Strategic Leadership Team Alignment: Profile of an Intervention Program , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[4]  John M. Nicholas.  Project Management for Business Engineering and Technology , 2011 .

[5]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[6]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Termination Doesn't Equal Project Failure , 2000, Computer.

[7]  Justus D. Naumann,et al.  Empirical investigation of systems development practices and results , 1984, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Jack J. Phillips,et al.  The Project Management Scorecard: Measuring the Success of Project Management Solutions , 2002 .

[9]  B. N. Baker,et al.  Factors Affecting Project Success , 2008 .

[10]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The one-minute risk assessment tool , 2004, CACM.

[11]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  The impact of size and volatility on IT project performance , 2007, CACM.

[12]  Elizabeth Daniel,et al.  Benefits management : delivering value from IS & IT investments , 2005 .

[13]  J. Kelly,et al.  Managing Value as a Management Style for Projects , 2007 .

[14]  Brian Randell,et al.  Software engineering : report on a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Garmisch, Germany, 7th to 11th October 1968 , 1969 .

[15]  Brian Randell,et al.  Software Engineering: As it was in 1968 , 1979, ICSE.

[16]  A. Shenhar,et al.  The relative importance of project success dimensions , 1997 .

[17]  Judith C. Kingstone,et al.  Managing at the Speed of Change , 1998 .

[18]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Valuing information technology infrastructures: a growth options approach , 2007, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[19]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[20]  AGILE DEVELOPMENT : LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FIRST SCRUM , 2004 .

[21]  Erling S. Andersen,et al.  Goal Directed Project Management: Effective Techniques and Strategies , 1998 .

[22]  Anton de Wit,et al.  Measurement of project success , 1988 .

[23]  Robert L. Glass.  Computing Calamities: Lessons Learned from Products, Projects, and Companies That Failed , 1998 .

[24]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .