Application of Terrestrial Laser Scanner to Evaluate the Influence of Root Collar Geometry on Stump Height after Mechanized Forest Operations

The height of tree stumps following mechanized forest operations can be influenced by machine-, tree-, terrain-, and operator-related characteristics. High stumps may pose different economic and technical disadvantages. Aside from a reduction in product recovery (often associated with sawlog potential), leaving high stumps can complicate future entries if smaller equipment with low ground clearance is used, particularly in the case where new machine operating trails are required. The objective of this exploratory study was to examine if correlations existed between the height of tree stumps following mechanized harvesting and the shape of the above-ground root collar, stump diameter, and distance to the machine operating trail. In total, 202 sample stumps of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and the surrounding terrain were scanned with a terrestrial laser scanner. The collected data was processed into a 3D-model and then analyzed. Stump height was compared with different characteristics such as stump diameter at the cut surface, distance to the machine operating trail, number of visible root flares per stump, and the root collar. The number of root flares per stump had a positive influence on stump diameter and height, showing a general trend of increasing diameter and height with the increasing number of root flares. Root angles also had an influence on the stump diameter. The diameter of a stump and the shape of the root collar at the cut surface together had a significant effect on stump height and the model reported explained half of the variation of stump heights. Taken together, these findings suggest that other factors than the ones studied can also contribute in influencing stump height during mechanized harvesting operations. Further investigations, including pre- and post-harvest scans of trees selected for removal, are warranted.

[1]  F. Guan,et al.  Detecting the Competition between Moso Bamboos and Broad-Leaved Trees in Mixed Forests Using a Terrestrial Laser Scanner , 2018, Forests.

[2]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparison of terrestrial laser scanning and X-ray scanning in measuring Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) branch structure , 2018 .

[3]  Wenjian Ni,et al.  Effects of Tree Trunks on Estimation of Clumping Index and LAI from HemiView and Terrestrial LiDAR , 2018 .

[4]  P. Cournède,et al.  Validation of a functional-structural tree model using terrestrial Lidar data , 2017 .

[5]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Reactions to gap emergence: Norway spruce increases growth while European beech features horizontal space occupation – evidence by repeated 3D TLS measurements , 2017 .

[6]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Expanding Ground-based Harvesting onto Steep Terrain: A Review , 2015 .

[7]  Sanna Kaasalainen,et al.  Indirect emissions of forest bioenergy: detailed modeling of stump‐root systems , 2014 .

[8]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Stem biomass estimation based on stem reconstruction from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds , 2013 .

[9]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Structural crown properties of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in mixed versus pure stands revealed by terrestrial laser scanning , 2013, Trees.

[10]  N. Coops,et al.  Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand , 2010, Trees.

[11]  Barry Gardiner,et al.  Destructive storms in European forests: past and forthcoming impacts. , 2010 .

[12]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna®) , 2008 .

[13]  Hans-Gerd Maas,et al.  Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data , 2008 .

[14]  Jing Chen,et al.  Retrieving crown leaf area index from an individual tree using ground-based lidar data , 2008, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing.

[15]  P. Radtke,et al.  Detailed Stem Measurements of Standing Trees from Ground-Based Scanning Lidar , 2006, Forest Science.

[16]  Han-Sup Han,et al.  Effect of Ground Slope, Stump Diameter, and Species on Stump Height for Feller-Buncher and Chainsaw Felling , 2005 .

[17]  Pete Watt,et al.  Measuring forest structure with terrestrial laser scanning , 2005 .

[18]  Colin Lin,et al.  Paper 213-30 an Introduction to Quantile Regression and the Quantreg Procedure , 2005 .

[19]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Assessing forest metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar , 2004 .