Understanding the Impact of Information Representation on Willingness to Share Information

Since the release of the first activity tracker, there has been a steady increase in the number of sensors embedded in wearable devices and with it in the amount and diversity of information that can be derived from these sensors. This development leads to novel privacy threats for users. In a web survey with 248 participants, we explored whether users' willingness to share private data is dependent on how the data is requested by an application. Specifically, requests can be formulated as access to sensor data or as access to information derived from the sensor data (e.g., accelerometer vs. sleep quality). We show that non-expert users lack an understanding of how the two representation levels relate to each other. The results suggest that the willingness to share sensor data over derived information is governed by whether the derived information has positive or negative connotations (e.g., training intensity vs. life expectancy). Using the results of the survey, we derive implications for supporting users in protecting their private data collected via wearable sensors.

[1]  Anthony Rowe,et al.  eWatch: a wearable sensor and notification platform , 2006, International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN'06).

[2]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  Rethinking location sharing: exploring the implications of social-driven vs. purpose-driven location sharing , 2010, UbiComp.

[3]  Lin Xiaokang,et al.  An Effective Way to Improve Actigraphic Algorithm by Using Tri-axial Accelerometer in Sleep Detection , 2014, 2014 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[4]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data , 2005, AAAI.

[5]  Yi Hong,et al.  Protection of Patient's Privacy and Data Security in E-Health Services , 2008, 2008 International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics.

[6]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Your Location has been Shared 5,398 Times!: A Field Study on Mobile App Privacy Nudging , 2015, CHI.

[7]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Privacy as part of the app decision-making process , 2013, CHI.

[8]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures , 2011, CHI.

[9]  Isabel Pedersen Are Wearables Really Ready to Wear? [Viewpoint] , 2014, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[10]  Kristof Van Laerhoven,et al.  Mobile Interactions Augmented by Wearable Computing: A Design Space and Vision , 2016, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  Project Jacquard: Interactive Digital Textiles at Scale , 2016, CHI.

[12]  Toby Mündel,et al.  Skin temperature as a thermal controller of exercise intensity , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[13]  M. Granat,et al.  The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[14]  Rita Paradiso,et al.  A wearable health care system based on knitted integrated sensors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[15]  Usman Zulfiqar,et al.  Relation of high heart rate variability to healthy longevity. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  Understanding how visual representations of location feeds affect end-user privacy concerns , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[17]  Jane Yung-jen Hsu,et al.  GETA sandals: a footstep location tracking system , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Begoña García Zapirain,et al.  A Stress Sensor Based on Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) Controlled by ZigBee , 2012, Sensors.

[19]  A. Page,et al.  Physical activity patterns in normal, overweight and obese individuals using minute-by-minute accelerometry , 2000, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.