Safety of autotransplants with high-dose melphalan in renal failure: a pharmacokinetic and toxicity study.

Melphalan (MEL) is probably the most effective chemotherapeutic agent in multiple myeloma (MM) with a clear dose-response effect. It can be escalated without excessive toxicity to 200 mg/m2, a myeloablative dose requiring hematopoietic stem cell support. Patients with marked renal insufficiency, not an infrequent finding in MM, have either received reduced doses or have been excluded from therapy with high-dose MEL. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the relationship between MEL pharmacokinetics and renal function in 20 patients with MM. Six patients had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, <40 ml/min), including five on chronic hemodialysis. Three patients with severe renal impairment first received a low test dose of MEL (16 mg/m2) for pharmacokinetic studies. All patients received 200 mg/m2 MEL divided into two equal doses of 100 mg/m2 i.v. on 2 consecutive days, followed by the administration of peripheral blood stem cells. MEL pharmacokinetics, performed after the first dose of 100 mg/m2, was not adversely affected by impaired renal function. The median half-life (t1/2), area under the concentration curve, and clearance of MEL were 1.1 h, 5.5 mg h/liter, and 27.5 liter/h, respectively, in patients with a creatinine clearance of <40 ml/min compared to 1.9, 7.9, and 23.6 for the others. Renal insufficiency also had no apparent negative impact on the quality of peripheral blood stem cell collections and did not adversely affect posttransplant engraftment, transfusion requirements, incidence of severe mucositis, or overall survival. However, it was associated with longer durations of fever (P = 0. 0005) and hospitalization (P = 0.004). No transplant-related deaths were observed. Plasma t1/2 and area under the concentration curve differed by a factor of 10 and MEL clearance by a factor of 5 between patients with the lowest and highest values. These large variations in MEL elimination could not be explained by patient or disease characteristics. We conclude that renal failure does not require dose reduction of MEL in autologous transplant. Due to marked interindividual variation in MEL elimination, pharmacokinetically guided dosing as well as cellular pharmacology studies may be helpful in achieving a more uniform antitumor effect.

[1]  N. Ifrah,et al.  High‐dose therapy in multiple myeloma: A prospective randomized study of the “intergroupe français du myelome” , 1995 .

[2]  A. Engin Differences in Blood Glutathione Levels of Patients with Advanced or Localized Carcinoma , 1995, Tumori.

[3]  P. Moreau,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan in adults: influence of renal function. , 1994, Anticancer research.

[4]  T. Hickish,et al.  High-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation in previously untreated myeloma. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide: a new preparative regimen for autologous marrow or blood stem cell transplantation in high-risk multiple myeloma. , 1993, Blood.

[6]  P. Ravaud,et al.  High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: results of a phase II trial involving 63 patients. , 1993, Blood.

[7]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Plasma cell dyscrasias. , 1992, JAMA.

[8]  M. Gore,et al.  High-dose busulfan in patients with myeloma. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Low-risk intensive therapy for multiple myeloma with combined autologous bone marrow and blood stem cell support. , 1992, Blood.

[10]  N. Ifrah,et al.  Double-intensive therapy in high-risk multiple myeloma. , 1992, Blood.

[11]  A. Hercbergs,et al.  Erythrocyte glutathione and tumour response to chemotherapy , 1992, The Lancet.

[12]  B. Mazières,et al.  Intensive combined therapy for previously untreated aggressive myeloma. , 1992, Blood.

[13]  F. Chauvin,et al.  Pharmacokinetically guided dosing for intravenous melphalan: a pilot study in patients with advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[14]  S. Eksborg,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of oral melphalan in relation to renal function in multiple myeloma patients. , 1989, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[15]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Prognostic factors with high-dose melphalan for refractory multiple myeloma [see comments] , 1988 .

[16]  B. Cheson,et al.  The systemic administration of intravenous melphalan. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Slevin,et al.  Multiple myeloma treated with high dose intravenous melphalan , 1987, British journal of haematology.

[18]  C. Fenselau,et al.  Conversion of melphalan to 4-(glutathionyl)phenylalanine. A novel mechanism for conjugation by glutathione-S-transferases. , 1987, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[19]  A. G. Bosanquet,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous melphalan during routine treatment of multiple myeloma. , 1982, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[20]  T. L. Evans,et al.  Kinetics of intravenous melphalan , 1979, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[21]  D. Alberts,et al.  Hydrolysis and protein binding of melphalan. , 1978, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  Cockcroft Dw,et al.  Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine , 1976 .

[23]  Roger W. Jelliffe,et al.  Creatinine Clearance: Bedside Estimate , 1973 .

[24]  D. Speed,et al.  Melphalan in the Treatment of Myelomatosis , 1964, British medical journal.