Regularity Revisited: Evidence from Lexical Access of Verbs and Nouns in Greek

The present study investigates the relationship between morphological regularity and form during lexical processing using a visual priming paradigm varying the prime duration. We addressed the effect of regularity on morphological facilitation in nouns and verbs by exploiting particular characteristics of a highly inflected language, Greek, in which it is possible to manipulate morphological regularity while controlling the degree of orthographic overlap between morphological relatives. The effects of morphological regularity were found to crucially depend on the time course of lexical access. Moreover, morphological regularity was found to affect nouns and verbs differentially. We interpret these findings with respect to the distinction between affix processing and allomorph retrieval and discuss the issues of form overlap and orthographic boundaries in morphological processing.

[1]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. , 1995 .

[2]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[3]  K. Forster,et al.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Modeling morphological processing. , 1995 .

[5]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form , 2000 .

[6]  W. Badecker,et al.  Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task , 2002 .

[7]  K. Forster,et al.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[9]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[10]  William Badecker,et al.  Stem Homograph Inhibition and Stem Allomorphy: Representing and Processing Inflected Forms in a Multilevel Lexical System☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[11]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Words, Rules and Stems in the Italian Mental Lexicon , 2002 .

[12]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[13]  L. Feldman,et al.  Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed primes: lexical architecture or modality-specific processes? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Geert Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology 1992 , 1993 .

[15]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  J. Morais,et al.  Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. , 1995 .

[17]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[18]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[19]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[20]  C. Fowler,et al.  The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[21]  J. Morton,et al.  The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[22]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Morphology, modality, and lexical architecture , 1997 .

[23]  Geert Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology 1996 , 1997 .

[24]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .

[25]  S. D. Lima,et al.  The reality of linguistic rules , 1994 .

[26]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. , 1991 .

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The architecture of language , 2000 .

[28]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Priming homographic stems , 1989 .

[29]  K I Forster,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[30]  K. Tsapkini,et al.  Does Phonological Change Play a Role in the Recognition of Derived Forms across Modalities? , 1999, Brain and Language.

[31]  R. Baayen,et al.  Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .

[32]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Regular and Irregular Morphology and the Psychological Status of Rules of Grammar , 1991 .

[33]  Geert Booij,et al.  Against split morphology , 1993 .

[34]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[35]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study , 2000 .