论文信息 - Conceptualizing Space: Reply

Conceptualizing Space: Reply

We read with interest the sundry points raised by King in his comment (2002) on our article (Anselin and Cho 2002). Given the space and time constraints in this forum, it is impossible for us to address adequately all of the issues here. It is sufficient to say that we strongly disagree with King's claims that we are “missing the point.” We will pursue a more thorough and formal rebuttal elsewhere, but would like to set the record straight on a few issues in the limited space provided here.

Luc Anselin | Wendy K. Tam Cho | L. Anselin | W. Cho

[1] Harry H. Kelejian,et al. Spatial Correlation: A Suggested Alternative to the Autoregressive Model , 1995 .

[2] Robert Haining,et al. Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[3] Gary King. Isolating Spatial Autocorrelation, Aggregation Bias, and Distributional Violations in Ecological Inference: Comment on Anselin and Cho , 2002, Political Analysis.

[4] Mike Rees,et al. 5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[5] Luc Anselin,et al. Spatial Effects and Ecological Inference , 2002, Political Analysis.

[6] Luc Anselin,et al. Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics , 1995 .

[7] Gary King,et al. Geography, Statistics, and Ecological Inference , 2000 .

[8] Leland Gerson Neuberg,et al. A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data , 1999 .