Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. Retrieval techniques , 1987 .
[2] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.
[3] Stefano Mizzaro,et al. Relevance: The Whole History , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[4] Patrick Wilson,et al. Situational relevance , 1973, Inf. Storage Retr..
[5] Taemin Kim Park,et al. Toward a Theory of User-Based Relevance: A Call for a New Paradigm of Inquiry , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[6] Judy Bateman. Changes in Relevance Criteria: A Longitudinal Study. , 1998 .
[7] Stephen P. Harter,et al. Psychological Relevance and Information Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[8] Paul B. Kantor,et al. Cross-Evaluation: A new model for information system evaluation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9] Anita Komlodi. Task management support in information seeking: a case for search histories , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[10] Xiaoli Huang,et al. Developing a Cross-Disciplinary Typology of Topical Relevance Relationships as the Basis for a Topic-Oriented Information Architecture , 2009 .
[11] Don R. Swanson,et al. Information Retrieval as a Trial-And-Error Process , 1977, The Library Quarterly.
[12] José Luis Vicedo González,et al. TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[13] Harry W. Bruce,et al. A Cognitive View of the Situational Dynamism of User-Centered Relevance Estimation , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[14] Ryen W. White,et al. Policy capturing models for multi-faceted relevance judgments , 2005, ASIST.
[15] C. A. Cuadra,et al. OPENING THE BLACK BOX OF ‘RELEVANCE’ , 1967 .
[16] Tefko Saracevic,et al. RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[17] Ellen M. Voorhees,et al. TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval (Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing) , 2005 .
[18] Linda Schamber. Relevance and Information Behavior. , 1994 .
[19] Paul B. Kantor,et al. Using cross-evaluation to evaluate interactive QA systems , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[20] Carol A. Bean,et al. Topical Relevance Relationships. II. An Exploratory Study and Preliminary Typology , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[21] C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al. A New Theoretical Framework for Information Retrieval , 1986, SIGIR Forum.
[22] Alexander T. Nicolai,et al. A Note on the Concept of Relevance , 2007 .
[23] M. E. Maron,et al. An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system , 1985, CACM.
[24] Don R. Swanson,et al. Subjective versus Objective Relevance in Bibliographic Retrieval Systems , 1986, The Library Quarterly.
[25] Gary Marchionini,et al. Search histories for user support in user interfaces , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[26] Mortimer Taube Associates. Storage and retrieval of information by means of the association of ideas , 1955 .
[27] Cyril W. Cleverdon,et al. Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems , 1960 .
[28] C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al. (invited paper) A new theoretical framework for information retrieval , 1986, SIGIR '86.
[29] Birger Hjørland. The foundation of the concept of relevance , 2009 .
[30] R. A. Fairthorne,et al. The patterns of retrieval , 1956 .
[31] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. Characteristics of Texts Affecting Relevance Judgments , 1993 .
[32] Douglas G. Schultz,et al. A Field Experimental Approach to the Study of Relevance Assessments in Relation to Document Searching. Final Report to the National Science Foundation. Volume II, Appendices. , 1967 .
[33] D. A. Kemp. Relevance, pertinence and information system development , 1974, Inf. Storage Retr..
[34] Dagobert Soergel,et al. Relevance criteria used by teachers in selecting oral history materials , 2005, ASIST.
[35] Joseph W. Janes,et al. Other People's Judgments: A Comparison of Users' and Others' Judgments of Document Relevance, Topicality, and Utility , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[36] Robert A. Fairthorne,et al. Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction , 1969, J. Documentation.
[37] Nils Pharo,et al. The effect of task type on preferred element types in an XML-based retrieval system , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[38] Patrick Wilson,et al. Some Fundamental Concepts of Information Retrieval. , 1978 .
[39] Mounia Lalmas,et al. Logical Models in Information Retrieval: Introduction and Overview , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[40] Lauren B Doyle. IS RELEVANCE AN ADEQUATE CRITERION IN RETRIEVAL SYSTEM EVALUATION , 1963 .
[41] Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al. Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality? , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[42] C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al. Towards an information logic , 1989, SIGIR '89.
[43] Shyama Balakrishnan,et al. Principles of information retrieval , 2000 .
[44] Xiaoli Huang. Relevance, Rhetoric, and Argumentation: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry into Patterns of Thinking and Information Structuring , 2009 .
[45] Ole Harbo,et al. Theory and application of information research : proceedings of the second International Research Forum on Information Science, 3-6 August 1977, Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen , 1980 .
[46] Pia Borlund,et al. The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[47] R. G. Thorne. THE EFFICIENCY OF SUBJECT CATALOGUES AND THE COST OF INFORMATION SEARCHES , 1955 .
[48] Dagobert Soergel,et al. Relevance judges' understanding of topical relevance types: An explication of an enriched concept of topical relevance , 2004, ASIST.
[49] Michael B. Eisenberg,et al. A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..
[50] William S. Cooper,et al. A definition of relevance for information retrieval , 1971, Inf. Storage Retr..
[51] Pia Borlund,et al. The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..
[52] Thomas J. Froehlich,et al. Relevance Reconsidered - Towards an Agenda for the 21st Century: Introduction to Special Topic Issue on Relevance Research , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[53] Peiling Wang. A cognitive model of document selection of real users of information retrieval systems , 1994 .
[54] Carl S. Wise. Multiple word coding vs. random coding for the rapid selector. A reply to calvin N. mooers , 1952 .
[55] T. Saracevic,et al. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[56] Carol L. Barry. User-Defined Relevance Criteria: An Exploratory Study , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[57] Alfred J. Lotka,et al. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .
[58] Carol L. Barry,et al. Order Effects: A Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance. , 1988 .
[59] S. Bradford. "Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford , 1985 .
[60] Edie M. Rasmussen,et al. Searching for images: The analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[61] Linda Schamber,et al. User Criteria in Relevance Evaluation: Toward Development of a Measurement Scale. , 1996 .
[62] M. E. Maron,et al. On Relevance, Probabilistic Indexing and Information Retrieval , 1960, JACM.
[63] G. Weiler. IV.—ON RELEVANCE , 1962 .
[64] William R. Hersh,et al. Relevance and Retrieval Evaluation: Perspectives from Medicine , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[65] Birger Hjørland,et al. The foundation of the concept of relevance , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[66] Dong Wang,et al. Order effect in relevance judgment , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[67] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory , 1996, J. Documentation.
[68] M. E. Maron,et al. On indexing, retrieval and the meaning of about , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[69] Dagobert Soergel,et al. Organizing information - principles of data base and retrieval systems , 1985 .
[70] William S. Cooper,et al. On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[71] Birger Hjørland,et al. Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[72] D. Hillman. The notion of relevance (I) , 1964 .
[73] Cyril W. Cleverdon,et al. Factors determining the performance of indexing systems , 1966 .
[74] T. Park. The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An Empirical Study , 1993, The Library Quarterly.
[75] Pertti Vakkari,et al. Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[76] Peiling Wang,et al. A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study II. Decisions at the Reading and Citing Stages , 1999, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
[77] Linda Schamber. Users' criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations , 1991 .
[78] Carol L. Barry,et al. Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[79] William Goffman,et al. A methodology for test and evaluation of information retrieval systems , 1966, Inf. Storage Retr..
[80] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Dimensions of relevance , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..
[81] Kam-Fai Wong,et al. Aboutness from a commonsense perspective , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[82] Sandra G. Hirsh. Children's Relevance Criteria and Information Seeking on Electronic Resources , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[83] David Bodoff,et al. Relevance for browsing, relevance for searching , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[84] Documentation , 2006 .
[85] T. Saracevic. Relevance: A Review of the Literature and a Framework for Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. Part II , 2006 .
[86] James Allan,et al. A survey in indexing and searching XML documents , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[87] Deirdre Wilson,et al. Relevance theory: A tutorial , 2002 .
[88] Peiling Wang,et al. A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study I. Document Selection , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[89] Michael Eisenberg,et al. Order effects: A study of the possible influence of presentation order on user judgments of document relevance , 1988, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[90] Stuart A. Sutton. The Role of Attorney Mental Models of Law in Case Relevance Determinations: An Exploratory Analysis , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[91] Cyril W. Cleverdon,et al. Aslib Cranfield research project - Factors determining the performance of indexing systems; Volume 1, Design; Part 2, Appendices , 1966 .
[92] Mary Anne Warren. The Relevance of Relationships , 2000 .
[93] Rebecca Green,et al. Topical Relevance Relationships. I. Why Topic Matching Fails , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[94] Marcia J. Bates,et al. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .
[95] C. D. Gull. Seven years of work on the organization of materials in the special library , 1956 .
[96] Tefko Saracevic. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance , 2007 .
[97] Carol L. Barry. The Identification of User Criteria of Relevance and Document Characteristics: Beyond the Topical Ap , 1993 .
[98] George Kingsley Zipf,et al. Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .
[99] Dagobert Soergel,et al. An evidence perspective on topical relevance types and its implications for exploratory and task-based retrieval , 2006, Inf. Res..