Sex and Power: sexual dimorphism in trait variability and its eco-evolutionary and statistical implications

Biomedical and clinical sciences are experiencing a renewed interest in the fact that males and females differ in many anatomic, physiological, and behavioral traits. Sex differences in trait variability, however, are yet to receive similar recognition. In medical science, mammalian females are assumed to have higher trait variability due to estrous cycles (the ‘estrus-mediated variability hypothesis’); historically in biomedical research, females have been excluded for this reason. Contrastingly, evolutionary theory and associated data support the ‘greater male variability hypothesis’. Here, we test these competing hypotheses in 218 traits measured in >26,900 mice, using meta-analysis methods. Neither hypothesis could universally explain patterns in trait variability. Sex-bias in variability was trait-dependent. While greater male variability was found in morphological traits, females were much more variable in immunological traits. Sex-specific variability has eco-evolutionary ramifications including sex-dependent responses to climate change, as well as statistical implications including power analysis considering sex difference in variance.

[1]  I. Zucker,et al.  Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women , 2020, Biology of Sex Differences.

[2]  N. Altman,et al.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation , 2020, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Rutz,et al.  How STRANGE are your study animals? , 2020, Nature.

[4]  A. Senior,et al.  Revisiting and expanding the meta‐analysis of variation: The log coefficient of variation ratio , 2020, Research synthesis methods.

[5]  Dalia A. Conde,et al.  Sex differences in adult lifespan and aging rates of mortality across wild mammals , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Revisiting and expanding the meta-analysis of variation: The log coefficient of variation ratio, lnCVR , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  James Zou,et al.  Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering , 2019, Nature.

[8]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[9]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Ling Chen,et al.  Prenatal hypoxia impairs cardiac mitochondrial and ventricular function in guinea pig offspring in a sex-related manner. , 2018, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[11]  A. Beery,et al.  Inclusion of females does not increase variability in rodent research studies , 2018, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[12]  S. Evans,et al.  Sex Differences in the Anorexigenic Effects of Dexfenfluramine and Amphetamine in Baboons , 2018, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[13]  M. Herzog,et al.  Sex-related differences in vision are heterogeneous , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[14]  T. Janicke,et al.  Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[15]  M. Randall,et al.  Sex differences in the role of phospholipase A2‐dependent arachidonic acid pathway in the perivascular adipose tissue function in pigs , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Anna Nowogrodzki Clinical research: Inequality in medicine , 2017, Nature.

[17]  David P Wolfer,et al.  Similar reliability and equivalent performance of female and male mice in the open field and water‐maze place navigation task , 2017, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.

[18]  Steve D. M. Brown,et al.  Prevalence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian phenotypic traits , 2017, Nature Communications.

[19]  Elizabeth Tipton,et al.  Robust Variance Meta-Regression [R package robumeta version 2.0] , 2017 .

[20]  Dalia A. Conde,et al.  Individual heterogeneity determines sex differences in mortality in a monogamous bird with reversed sexual dimorphism , 2017, The Journal of animal ecology.

[21]  N. Karp,et al.  The role of sex and body weight on the metabolic effects of high-fat diet in C57BL/6N mice , 2017, Nutrition & Diabetes.

[22]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists , 2017, BMC Biology.

[23]  B. Smarr,et al.  Sex differences in variability across timescales in BALB/c mice , 2017, Biology of Sex Differences.

[24]  Julie K. Pfeiffer,et al.  Sex-Dependent Intestinal Replication of an Enteric Virus , 2017, Journal of Virology.

[25]  C. Woolley,et al.  Considering Sex as a Biological Variable Will Be Valuable for Neuroscience Research , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Steve D. M. Brown,et al.  High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes , 2017 .

[27]  J. Becker,et al.  Female rats are not more variable than male rats: a meta-analysis of neuroscience studies , 2016, Biology of Sex Differences.

[28]  T. Janicke,et al.  Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom , 2016, Science Advances.

[29]  J. Clayton Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine , 2016, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[30]  A. Arnold,et al.  Are females more variable than males in gene expression? Meta-analysis of microarray datasets , 2015, Biology of Sex Differences.

[31]  I. Zucker,et al.  Opinion: Sex inclusion in basic research drives discovery , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Zachary F. Fisher,et al.  robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis , 2015, 1503.02220.

[33]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Meta‐analysis of variation: ecological and evolutionary applications and beyond , 2015 .

[34]  John Meitzen,et al.  Intrinsic excitability varies by sex in prepubertal striatal medium spiny neurons. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  F. Weissing,et al.  Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[36]  K. Flanagan Sexual dimorphism in biomedical research: a call to analyse by sex. , 2014, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[37]  Francis S Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies , 2014, Nature.

[38]  I. Zucker,et al.  Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  L. Engqvist,et al.  THE VARIABILITY IS IN THE SEX CHROMOSOMES , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[42]  Ian R. Cleasby,et al.  Neglected biological patterns in the residuals , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  I. Zucker,et al.  Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[44]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package , 2010 .

[45]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[46]  P. Laake,et al.  Greater intrasex phenotype variability in males than in females is a fundamental aspect of the gender differences in humans. , 2009, Developmental psychobiology.

[47]  Karla Zadnik,et al.  Sex- and gender-based differences in healthy and diseased eyes. , 2008, Optometry.

[48]  I. Deary,et al.  Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence: A New Look at the Old Question , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[49]  D. Houle,et al.  Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[50]  H. Kokko,et al.  Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[51]  J. Mogil,et al.  The case for the inclusion of female subjects in basic science studies of pain , 2005, Pain.

[52]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  A. Desmond,et al.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex by Charles Darwin , 2004 .

[54]  A. Møller,et al.  Components of phenotypic variation in avian ornamental and non-ornamental feathers , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[55]  J. Archer,et al.  Variability among Males in Sexually Selected Attributes , 2003 .

[56]  A. Møller,et al.  Phenotypic variation and fluctuating asymmetry in sexually dimorphic feather ornaments in relation to sex and mating system , 1999 .

[57]  H. Kokko,et al.  Sexual reproduction and population dynamics: the role of polygyny and demographic sex differences , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  L. Rowe,et al.  The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  M. Zuk,et al.  Sex differences in parasite infections: patterns and processes. , 1996, International journal for parasitology.

[60]  L. Hedges,et al.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. , 1995, Science.

[61]  A. Møller,et al.  A resolution of the lek paradox , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  O. Rieppel Patterns and processes , 1993, Nature.

[63]  C. Grossman Possible underlying mechanisms of sexual dimorphism in the immune response, fact and hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of steroid biochemistry.

[64]  Z. Zeng LONG‐TERM CORRELATED RESPONSE, INTERPOPULATION COVARIATION, AND INTERSPECIFIC ALLOMETRY , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[65]  D. Weeks,et al.  Two-Sex Models: Chaos, Extinction, and Other Dynamic Consequences of Sex , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[66]  R. Bee Patterns and Processes , 1974 .

[67]  James Jw Covariances between relatives due to sex-linked genes. , 1973 .

[68]  J. James Covariances between relatives due to sex-linked genes. , 1973, Biometrics.

[69]  Neville Goodman,et al.  The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871 .

[70]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[71]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .