Does the redundancy effect exist in electronic slideshow assisted lecturing?

This study investigated the occurrence of the redundancy effect in a normal classroom when presenting multiple formats of information with the assistance of electronic slideshows. A virtual classroom that simulates a normal classroom was developed as the experimental platform in this study. One hundred and twenty undergraduates and graduated students were randomly assigned to the following three experimental conditions with varying presentation formats: audio only condition, visual only condition, and audio-visual condition. Test accuracy scores and cognitive load self-rating scales on both the recall and the comprehension tests were used to measure differences between various conditions. Analyses revealed a reverse audiovisual redundancy effect. For the recall test, the presentation of on-screen textual information accompanied by spoken narrations outperformed the presentation with the audio only source on test accuracy scores and indicated lower self-ratings of cognitive load. For the comprehension test, the presentation of on-screen textual information accompanied by spoken narrations outperformed the presentations with either of these two sources with higher test accuracy scores and lower cognitive load self-ratings. Classroom interference and segmented presentation were hypothesized to be two possible factors in determining the presence or absence of the redundancy effect. Investigated the redundancy effect in electronic slideshow assisted lecturing.Used a virtual classroom that simulated a normal classroom as a research platform.A reverse audiovisual redundancy effect was obtained.Audio-visual condition resulted in the best performance among the three conditions.Audio-visual condition reported lower cognitive load than the audio only condition.

[1]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Multimedia Learning , 2008 .

[2]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[3]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[4]  Slava Kalyuga Cognitive Load Theory: Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[5]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[6]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  The Virtual Classroom: A Virtual Reality Environment for the Assessment and Rehabilitation of Attention Deficits , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  What comes with technological convenience? Exploring the behaviors and performances of learning with computer-mediated dictionaries , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? , 2010 .

[9]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[10]  Eric Jamet,et al.  The Effect of Redundant Text in Multimedia Instruction , 2007 .

[11]  Paul Chandler,et al.  When Redundant On-Screen Text in Multimedia Technical Instruction Can Interfere With Learning , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[12]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[13]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Effects of cues and real objects on learning in a mobile device supported environment , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  J. Sweller Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[16]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[17]  F. Paas,et al.  Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design , 2009 .

[18]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[19]  Fred Paas,et al.  Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Instructional benefits of spoken words: A review of cognitive load factors , 2012 .

[21]  R. Mayer,et al.  Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening , 2002 .

[22]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Effects of digital dictionary format on incidental acquisition of spelling knowledge and cognitive load during second language learning: Click-on vs. key-in dictionaries , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[23]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[24]  Jane Wright The role of computer software in presenting information. , 2009, Nursing management.

[25]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Effects of prior knowledge on learning from different compositions of representations in a mobile learning environment , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Todd Bowerly,et al.  A Virtual Reality Scenario for All Seasons: The Virtual Classroom , 2009, CNS Spectrums.

[27]  Unai Díaz-Orueta,et al.  AULA virtual reality test as an attention measure: Convergent validity with Conners’ Continuous Performance Test , 2014, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[28]  D. Tranel,et al.  Memory performance after head injury: contributions of malingering, litigation status, psychological factors, and medication use. , 1997, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[29]  Scott R Millis,et al.  Detecting Incomplete Effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition , 2006, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[30]  John Sweller,et al.  Human cognitive architecture: Why some instructional procedures work and others do not. , 2012 .

[31]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. , 2011 .

[32]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .