Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period

Abstract. The modeling study presented here aims to estimate how uncertainties in global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions, variability, and trends may contribute to resolving discrepancies between simulated and observed methane (CH4) changes since 2000. A multi-model ensemble of 14 OH fields was analyzed and aggregated into 64 scenarios to force the offline atmospheric chemistry transport model LMDz (Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique) with a standard CH4 emission scenario over the period 2000–2016. The multi-model simulated global volume-weighted tropospheric mean OH concentration ([OH]) averaged over 2000–2010 ranges between 8.7×105 and 12.8×105 molec cm−3. The inter-model differences in tropospheric OH burden and vertical distributions are mainly determined by the differences in the nitrogen oxide (NO) distributions, while the spatial discrepancies between OH fields are mostly due to differences in natural emissions and volatile organic compound (VOC) chemistry. From 2000 to 2010, most simulated OH fields show an increase of 0.1–0.3×105 molec cm−3 in the tropospheric mean [OH], with year-to-year variations much smaller than during the historical period 1960–2000. Once ingested into the LMDz model, these OH changes translated into a 5 to 15 ppbv reduction in the CH4 mixing ratio in 2010, which represents 7 %–20 % of the model-simulated CH4 increase due to surface emissions. Between 2010 and 2016, the ensemble of simulations showed that OH changes could lead to a CH4 mixing ratio uncertainty of >±30 ppbv. Over the full 2000–2016 time period, using a common state-of-the-art but nonoptimized emission scenario, the impact of [OH] changes tested here can explain up to 54 % of the gap between model simulations and observations. This result emphasizes the importance of better representing OH abundance and variations in CH4 forward simulations and emission optimizations performed by atmospheric inversions.

[1]  D. Hauglustaine,et al.  Multi-species inversion of CH4, CO and H2 emissions from surface measurements , 2021 .

[2]  V. Brovkin,et al.  The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 , 2016, Earth System Science Data.

[3]  M. Chipperfield,et al.  Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on the interannual variability of methane and tropospheric ozone , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  S. Michel,et al.  Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement , 2019, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[5]  Michael Symonds,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Very strong atmospheric methane growth in the four years 2014‐2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement. , 2019, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[6]  E. Kort,et al.  Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012 , 2017, Earth System Science Data.

[8]  Mohamed Zerroukat,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations , 2011, Geoscientific Model Development.

[9]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 10 . 1029 / 2018 MS 001600 , 2019 .

[10]  N. Abraham,et al.  Tropospheric ozone in CCMI models and Gaussian process emulation to understand biases in the SOCOLv3 chemistry-climate model. , 2018, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[11]  L. Oman,et al.  Changes in Global Tropospheric OH Expected as a Result of Climate Change Over the Last Several Decades , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[12]  A. Turner,et al.  Modulation of hydroxyl variability by ENSO in the absence of external forcing , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Schultz,et al.  Severe Surface Ozone Pollution in China: A Global Perspective , 2018, Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

[14]  Model simulations of atmospheric methane and their evaluation using AGAGE/NOAA surface- and IAGOS-CARIBIC aircraft observations, 1997–2014 , 2018 .

[15]  P. Ciais,et al.  Simulating CH4 and CO2 over South and East Asia using the zoomed chemistry transport model LMDz-INCA , 2017, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[16]  William M. Putman,et al.  Chemical Mechanisms and Their Applications in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Earth System Model , 2017, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[17]  Fiona Tummon,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone at Northern Mid-Latitudes: Modeled and Measured Long-Term Changes , 2017 .

[18]  Jens Mühle,et al.  Role of atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Christian Frankenberg,et al.  Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning , 2017 .

[21]  Andrea Stenke,et al.  Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2017 .

[22]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  EDGAR v 4 . 3 . 2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970 – 2012 , 2017 .

[23]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Global wetland contribution to 2000–2012 atmospheric methane growth rate dynamics , 2017 .

[24]  G. Myhre,et al.  Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing , 2016 .

[25]  S. Rumbold,et al.  The Met Office HadGEM3-ES chemistry–climate model: evaluation of stratospheric dynamics and its impact on ozone , 2016 .

[26]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity , 2016 .

[27]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Interpreting space-based trends in carbon monoxide with multiple models , 2016 .

[28]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  Evaluation of simulated photolysis rates and their response to solar irradiance variability , 2016 .

[29]  R. Neely,et al.  Representation of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) CAM4-chem within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2016 .

[30]  P. Braesicke,et al.  Future Arctic ozone recovery: the importance of chemistry and dynamics , 2016 .

[31]  B. Josse,et al.  First implementation of secondary inorganic aerosols in the MOCAGE version R2.15.0 chemistry transport model , 2016 .

[32]  Daniel C. Anderson,et al.  Quantifying the causes of differences in tropospheric OH within global models , 2015 .

[33]  Ray F. Weiss,et al.  Atmospheric methane evolution the last 40 years , 2015 .

[34]  Bryan N. Duncan,et al.  Implications of carbon monoxide bias for methane lifetime and atmospheric composition in chemistry climate models , 2015 .

[35]  Volker Grewe,et al.  Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51 , 2015 .

[36]  Rolando R. Garcia,et al.  Simulation of polar ozone depletion: An update , 2015 .

[37]  E. Rozanov,et al.  Drivers of the tropospheric ozone budget throughout the 21st century under the medium-high climate scenario RCP 6.0 , 2015 .

[38]  R. Weiss,et al.  Role of OH variability in the stalling of the global atmospheric CH4 growth rate from 1999 to 2006 , 2015 .

[39]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants , 2015 .

[40]  G. Etiope Natural Gas Seepage: The Earth’s Hydrocarbon Degassing , 2015 .

[41]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Description and evaluation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1.2) , 2014 .

[42]  Jochen Landgraf,et al.  The photolysis module JVAL-14, compatible with the MESSy standard, and the JVal PreProcessor (JVPP) , 2014 .

[43]  R. Martin,et al.  Worldwide biogenic soil NO x emissions inferred from OMI NO 2 observations , 2014 .

[44]  R. Weiss,et al.  Observational evidence for interhemispheric hydroxyl-radical parity , 2014, Nature.

[45]  Wolfgang Knorr,et al.  Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years , 2014 .

[46]  C. Frantzidis,et al.  Response to Reviewers Reviewer #1 , 2010 .

[47]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Distribution and Trends of Tropospheric Ozone: An Observation-Based Review , 2014 .

[48]  M. Saunois,et al.  Atmospheric transport and chemistry of trace gases in LMDz5B: evaluation and implications for inverse modelling , 2014 .

[49]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Interactive comment on “ Description and evaluation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in the Community Earth System Model ( CESM 1 . 2 ) ” , 2022 .

[50]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Interannual variability in tropical tropospheric ozone and OH: The role of lightning , 2013 .

[51]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Three decades of global methane sources and sinks , 2013 .

[52]  Daniel R. Marsh,et al.  Climate change from 1850 to 2005 simulated in CESM1(WACCM) , 2013 .

[53]  J. Kaplan,et al.  Factors controlling variability in the oxidative capacity of the troposphere since the Last Glacial Maximum , 2013 .

[54]  Volker Grewe,et al.  Origin and Variability of Upper Tropospheric Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone at Northern Mid-Latitudes , 2013 .

[55]  L. Oman,et al.  The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite measurements and a chemistry‐climate simulation , 2013 .

[56]  C. J. Morcrette,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 4 . 0 and JULES Global Land 4 . 0 configurations , 2013 .

[57]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Aerosol and ozone changes as forcing for climate evolution between 1850 and 2100 , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[58]  Arlene M. Fiore,et al.  Climate versus emission drivers of methane lifetime against loss by tropospheric OH from 1860-2100 , 2012 .

[59]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .

[60]  E. Rozanov,et al.  The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm , 2012 .

[61]  P. Braesicke,et al.  Implementation of the Fast-JX Photolysis scheme (v6.4) into the UKCA component of the MetUM chemistry-climate model (v7.3) , 2012 .

[62]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Analysis of Present Day and Future OH and Methane Lifetime in the ACCMIP Simulations , 2012 .

[63]  Michael J. Prather,et al.  Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions , 2012 .

[64]  Michael J. Prather,et al.  Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry , 2012 .

[65]  Andrea Molod,et al.  The GEOS-5 Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Mean Climate and Development from MERRA to Fortuna , 2012 .

[66]  H. Tsujino,et al.  A New Global Climate Model of the Meteorological Research Institute: MRI-CGCM3 —Model Description and Basic Performance— , 2012 .

[67]  H. Eskes,et al.  Global NO x emission estimates derived from an assimilation of OMI tropospheric NO 2 columns , 2011 .

[68]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .

[69]  M. Kainuma,et al.  An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 Wm−2 radiative forcing , 2011 .

[70]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period , 2011 .

[71]  Luke D. Oman,et al.  The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO , 2011 .

[72]  Shamil Maksyutov,et al.  TransCom model simulations of CH4 and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH4 variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere , 2011 .

[73]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[74]  P. Jöckel,et al.  Small Interannual Variability of Global Atmospheric Hydroxyl , 2011, Science.

[75]  M. Deushi,et al.  Development of a Meteorological Research Institute Chemistry-Climate Model version 2 for the Study of Tropospheric and Stratospheric Chemistry , 2011 .

[76]  Patrick Jöckel,et al.  Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2) , 2010 .

[77]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997-2009) , 2010 .

[78]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Source attribution of the changes in atmospheric methane for 2006–2008 , 2010 .

[79]  David S. Lee,et al.  Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .

[80]  J. A. Pyle,et al.  Geoscientific Model Development Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 1 : The stratosphere , 2009 .

[81]  William J. Collins,et al.  Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 2: The Troposphere , 2008 .

[82]  D. Hauglustaine,et al.  Multi-species inversion of CH4, CO and H2 emissions from surface measurements , 2008 .

[83]  David A. Plummer,et al.  Technical Note: The CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere , 2008 .

[84]  Derek M. Cunnold,et al.  Renewed growth of atmospheric methane , 2008 .

[85]  F. Lott,et al.  The coupled chemistry-climate model LMDz-REPROBUS: description and evaluation of a transient simulation of the period 1980–1999 , 2008 .

[86]  J. Pereira,et al.  Global wildland fire emissions from 1960 to 2000 , 2008 .

[87]  Miguel Ángel Martínez,et al.  Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest , 2008, Nature.

[88]  G. Madec NEMO ocean engine , 2008 .

[89]  J. Attie,et al.  A new tropospheric and stratospheric Chemistry and Transport Model MOCAGE-Climat for multi-year studies: evaluation of the present-day climatology and sensitivity to surface processes , 2007 .

[90]  J. Penner,et al.  Global atmospheric chemistry: Integrating over fractional cloud cover , 2007 .

[91]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[92]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 4.1 (GFEDv4) , 2006 .

[93]  P. Ciais,et al.  Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform , 2005 .

[94]  Derek M. Cunnold,et al.  Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century , 2005 .

[95]  J. C. McConnell,et al.  Doubled CO2‐induced cooling in the middle atmosphere: Photochemical analysis of the ozone radiative feedback , 2004 .

[96]  Wouter Peters,et al.  On the role of hydroxyl radicals in the self-cleansing capacity of the troposphere , 2004 .

[97]  Jean-Francois Lamarque,et al.  Interactive chemistry in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model: Description and background tropospheric chemistry evaluation: INTERACTIVE CHEMISTRY IN LMDZ , 2004 .

[98]  B. Josse,et al.  Radon global simulations with the multiscale chemistry and transport model MOCAGE , 2004 .

[99]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Interannual variability and trend of CH4 lifetime as a measure for OH changes in the 1979–1993 time period , 2003 .

[100]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Can the variability in tropospheric OH be deduced from measurements of 1,1,1‐trichloroethane (methyl chloroform)? , 2003 .

[101]  D. Allen,et al.  Evaluation of lightning flash rate parameterizations for use in a global chemical transport model , 2002 .

[102]  Mark Lawrence,et al.  Interhemispheric di ff erences in the chemical characteristics of the Indian Ocean aerosol during INDOEX , 2002 .

[103]  Michael B. McElroy,et al.  Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation , 2000 .

[104]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  What controls tropospheric ozone , 2000 .

[105]  Frédéric Hourdin,et al.  The Use of Finite-Volume Methods for Atmospheric Advection of Trace Species. Part I: Test of Various Formulations in a General Circulation Model , 1999 .

[106]  A. Ridgwell,et al.  Consumption of atmospheric methane by soils: A process‐based model , 1999 .

[107]  Yuhang Wang,et al.  Anthropogenic forcing on tropospheric ozone and OH since preindustrial times , 1998 .

[108]  H. Levy,et al.  Empirical model of global soil‐biogenic NOχ emissions , 1995 .

[109]  Rolando R. Garcia,et al.  'Downward control' of the mean meridional circulation and temperature distribution of the polar winter stratosphere , 1994 .

[110]  D. Rind,et al.  Modeling Global Lightning Distributions in a General Circulation Model , 1994 .

[111]  G. Lambert,et al.  Reevaluation of the oceanic flux of methane: Uncertainties and long term variations , 1993 .

[112]  M. Manning,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetry in OH abundance inferred from measurements of atmospheric 14CO , 1992, Nature.

[113]  K. Emanuel A Scheme for Representing Cumulus Convection in Large-Scale Models , 1991 .

[114]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective , 1981 .

[115]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Estimates on the production of CO and H2 from the oxidation of hydrocarbon emissions from vegetation , 1978 .

[116]  D. Ehhalt The atmospheric cycle of methane , 1974 .

[117]  P. Crutzen A discussion of the chemistry of some minor constituents in the stratosphere and troposphere , 1973 .

[118]  H. Levy Normal Atmosphere: Large Radical and Formaldehyde Concentrations Predicted , 1971, Science.