Automated grading of renal cell carcinoma using whole slide imaging

Introduction: Recent technology developments have demonstrated the benefit of using whole slide imaging (WSI) in computer-aided diagnosis. In this paper, we explore the feasibility of using automatic WSI analysis to assist grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is a manual task traditionally performed by pathologists. Materials and Methods: Automatic WSI analysis was applied to 39 hematoxylin and eosin-stained digitized slides of clear cell RCC with varying grades. Kernel regression was used to estimate the spatial distribution of nuclear size across the entire slides. The analysis results were correlated with Fuhrman nuclear grades determined by pathologists. Results: The spatial distribution of nuclear size provided a panoramic view of the tissue sections. The distribution images facilitated locating regions of interest, such as high-grade regions and areas with necrosis. The statistical analysis showed that the maximum nuclear size was significantly different (P < 0.001) between low-grade (Grades I and II) and high-grade tumors (Grades III and IV). The receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the maximum nuclear size distinguished high-grade and low-grade tumors with a false positive rate of 0.2 and a true positive rate of 1.0. The area under the curve is 0.97. Conclusion: The automatic WSI analysis allows pathologists to see the spatial distribution of nuclei size inside the tumors. The maximum nuclear size can also be used to differentiate low-grade and high-grade clear cell RCC with good sensitivity and specificity. These data suggest that automatic WSI analysis may facilitate pathologic grading of renal tumors and reduce variability encountered with manual grading.

[1]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[2]  Walter Artibani,et al.  Grading systems in renal cell carcinoma. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[3]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Todd H. Stokes,et al.  Pathology imaging informatics for quantitative analysis of whole-slide images , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[5]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Variable Kernel Density Estimation , 1992 .

[6]  Maamoun M Al-Aynati,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma. , 2003, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  Christian Coulange,et al.  Prognostic value of nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma , 1995, Cancer.

[8]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Prognostic factors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 675 cases. , 2002, European urology.

[9]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[10]  J. D. Webster,et al.  Whole-Slide Imaging and Automated Image Analysis , 2014, Veterinary pathology.

[11]  J. Patard,et al.  A proposal for reclassification of the Fuhrman grading system in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. , 2009, European urology.

[12]  D. Jacqmin,et al.  Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma , 2005, Cancer.

[13]  David C Wilbur,et al.  Ovarian frozen section diagnosis: use of whole-slide imaging shows excellent correlation between virtual slide and original interpretations in a large series of cases. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study , 2006, BMC clinical pathology.

[15]  Drazen Jukic,et al.  Evaluation of 2 whole-slide imaging applications in dermatopathology. , 2008, Human pathology.

[16]  Jun Kong,et al.  Integrated morphologic analysis for the identification and characterization of disease subtypes , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Jun Kong,et al.  A data model and database for high-resolution pathology analytical image informatics , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[18]  L. Medeiros,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases , 1988, Cancer.

[19]  J. Cheville,et al.  The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading System for Renal Cell Carcinoma and Other Prognostic Parameters , 2013, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  Michael D Feldman,et al.  Beyond morphology: whole slide imaging, computer-aided detection, and other techniques. , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[21]  C. Kwak,et al.  Application of simplified Fuhrman grading system in clear‐cell renal cell carcinoma , 2011, BJU international.

[22]  Jun Kong,et al.  Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma on whole-slide images: Classification of stromal development , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  Special issue on whole slide microscopic image processing , 2011, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[24]  E. Parzen On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode , 1962 .

[25]  R. Figlin,et al.  Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[26]  S. Bektaş,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability of Fuhrman and Modified Fuhrman Grading Systems for Conventional Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2009, The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences.

[27]  Fang-Cheng Yeh,et al.  Mapping stain distribution in pathology slides using whole slide imaging , 2014, Journal of pathology informatics.

[28]  A. Huisman,et al.  Automatic Nuclei Segmentation in H&E Stained Breast Cancer Histopathology Images , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  B. Delahunt,et al.  Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Should be Based on Nucleolar Prominence , 2011, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[30]  G. Einarsson,et al.  Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients. , 2005, European urology.

[31]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  An efficient computational framework for the analysis of whole slide images: Application to follicular lymphoma immunohistochemistry , 2012, J. Comput. Sci..

[32]  H. Irshad,et al.  Methods for Nuclei Detection, Segmentation, and Classification in Digital Histopathology: A Review—Current Status and Future Potential , 2014, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Matteo Brunelli,et al.  Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system , 2005, Cancer.

[34]  Tomasz Markiewicz,et al.  Computer-assisted Fuhrman grading system for the analysis of clear-cell renal carcinoma: a pilot study , 2013 .

[35]  Padraig Cunningham,et al.  Ensemble based system for whole-slide prostate cancer probability mapping using color texture features , 2011, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[36]  B. Loftus,et al.  A comparative analysis of grading systems in renal adenocarcinoma , 1994, Histopathology.

[37]  Yousef Al-Kofahi,et al.  Improved Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Histopathology Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  F. Erdoğan,et al.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma , 2004, International journal of clinical practice.