Time–temperature profiles of multi-layer actuators

Abstract During accelerated testing of actuators, relatively high frequencies and electric fields are used and the resulting heat generation and self-heating of the actuator due to ferroelectric hysteresis loss becomes of increasing concern. It is therefore important to have knowledge of parameters such as the predicted actuator temperature, total loss per cycle and the overall heat transfer coefficient of the system. The heat generation in multi-layer actuators is studied as a function of driving frequency and applied electric field. The heat transfer coefficients and the total hysteresis loss per cycle in the device are estimated from fitting experimental data to analytical expressions of time–temperature profiles. The temperature rise is found to be approximately proportional to the frequency, while the total loss of the actuator per cycle increases with applied field and frequency. The high estimated values of heat transfer coefficient, which range from 140 to 210 W m −2  K −1 , are due to the high conductivity and thermal mass of the sample holder.

[1]  Sadayuki Takahashi,et al.  Temperature Characteristics for Multilayer Piezoelectric Ceramic Actuator , 1985 .

[2]  H. Kunkel,et al.  Finite-element analysis of vibrational modes in piezoelectric ceramic disks , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  K. Nagata,et al.  Relationship between Lifetime of Multilayer Ceramic Actuator and Temperature , 1995 .

[4]  Kenji Uchino,et al.  Heat generation in multilayer piezoelectric actuators , 1996 .

[5]  Toshio Tsuchiya,et al.  Lifetime and Degradation Mechanism of Multilayer Ceramic Actuator , 1998 .

[6]  V. Murray,et al.  Thermal generation, diffusion and dissipation in 1-3 piezocomposite sonar transducers: finite element analysis and experimental measurements , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[7]  H. Hagemann Loss mechanisms and domain stabilisation in doped BaTiO3 , 1978 .

[8]  A. Ritter,et al.  Reliability Studies on Electrostrictive Actuators , 1994 .

[9]  Pavel M. Chaplya,et al.  Dielectric and piezoelectric response of lead zirconate–lead titanate at high electric and mechanical loads in terms of non-180° domain wall motion , 2001 .

[10]  K. H. Härdtl,et al.  Electrical and mechanical losses in ferroelectric ceramics , 1982 .

[11]  T. A. Wheat,et al.  Ceramic actuators : Part 1: Materials , 1999 .

[12]  Kenji Uchino,et al.  Ceramic Actuators: Principles and Applications , 1993 .

[13]  Karl Lubitz,et al.  Piezoceramic multilayer actuators for fuel injection systems in automotive area , 2000, Smart Structures.

[14]  K. Uchino,et al.  Loss mechanisms in piezoelectrics: how to measure different losses separately , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  J.W.C. de Vries,et al.  Functional behavior of ceramic multilayer actuators with inactive parts , 1999 .

[16]  José Antonio Eiras,et al.  Interrelationship between self-heating and ferroelectric properties in PZT ceramics during polarization reorientation , 2000 .