EVALUATING THE POSSIBILITY OF TREE SPECIES CLASSIFICATION WITH DUAL-WAVELENGTH ALS DATA

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) plays an important role in spatial data acquisition. One of the advantages of this technique is laser beam penetration through vegetation, which makes it possible to not only obtain data on the tree canopy but also within and under the canopy. In recent years, multi-wavelength airborne laser scanning has been developed. This technique consists of simultaneous acquisition of point clouds in more than one band. The aim of this experiment was to examine and assess the possibilities of tree segmentation and species classification in an urban area. In this experiment, point clouds registered in two wavelengths (532 and 1064 nm) were used for tree segmentation and species classification. The data were acquired with a Riegl VQ-1560i-DW laser scanner over Elblag, Poland, during August 2018. Tree species collected by a botanist team within terrain measurements were used as a reference in the classification process. Within the experiment segmentation and classification process were performed. Regarding the segmentation, TerraScan software and Li et al.’s algorithm, implemented in LidR package were used. Results from both methods are clearly over-segmented in comparison to the manual segments. In Terrasolid segmentation, single reference segments are over-segmented in 28% of cases, whereas, for LidR, over-segmentation occurred in 73% of the segments. According the classification results, Thuja, Salix and Betula were the species, for which the highest classification accuracy was achieved.

[1]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparison of Tree Species Classifications at the Individual Tree Level by Combining ALS Data and RGB Images Using Different Algorithms , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Fang Qiu,et al.  Individual Tree Segmentation from LiDAR Point Clouds for Urban Forest Inventory , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Object-based analysis of multispectral airborne laser scanner data for land cover classification and map updating , 2017 .

[4]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[5]  Bisheng Yang,et al.  Towards Reconstructing 3D Buildings from ALS Data Based on Gestalt Laws , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Peter P. Flaig,et al.  Lidar intensity as a remote sensor of rock properties , 2011 .

[7]  Ahmed El-Rabbany,et al.  Multispectral LiDAR Data for Land Cover Classification of Urban Areas , 2017, Sensors.

[8]  D. Roberts,et al.  Urban tree species mapping using hyperspectral and lidar data fusion , 2014 .

[9]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF MULTI-WAVELENGTH AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA , 2012 .

[10]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Single-Sensor Solution to Tree Species Classification Using Multispectral Airborne Laser Scanning , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Martin Pfennigbauer,et al.  MULTI-WAVELENGTH AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION , 2013 .

[12]  Arvid Axelsson,et al.  Exploring Multispectral ALS Data for Tree Species Classification , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A New Method for Segmenting Individual Trees from the Lidar Point Cloud , 2012 .

[14]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Laser Scanning in Forests , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Caiyun Zhang,et al.  Mapping Individual Tree Species in an Urban Forest Using Airborne Lidar Data and Hyperspectral Imagery , 2012 .

[16]  Yong Fang,et al.  3 D LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION BASED ON MULTISPECTRAL LIDAR POINT CLOUDS , 2016 .