Automations influence on nuclear power plants: a look at three accidents and how automation played a role.

Nuclear power is one of the ways that we can design an efficient sustainable future. Automation is the primary system used to assist operators in the task of monitoring and controlling nuclear power plants (NPP). Automation performs tasks such as assessing the status of the plant's operations as well as making real time life critical situational specific decisions. While the advantages and disadvantages of automation are well studied in variety of domains, accidents remind us that there is still vulnerability to unknown variables. This paper will look at the effects of automation within three NPP accidents and incidents and will consider why automation failed in preventing these accidents from occurring. It will also review the accidents at the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima Daiichi NPP's in order to determine where better use of automation could have resulted in a more desirable outcome.

[1]  S S Stevens,et al.  HUMAN ENGINEERING FOR AN EFFECTIVE AIR-NAVIGATION AND TRAFFIC-CONTROL SYSTEM, AND APPENDIXES 1 THRU 3 , 1951 .

[2]  Guy A. Boy,et al.  Cognitive Function Analysis , 1998 .

[3]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[4]  J. C. Higgins,et al.  Human-system Interfaces to Automatic Systems: Review Guidance and Technical Basis , 2010 .

[5]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[6]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[8]  Evelyn O. Talbott,et al.  Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective , 2004 .

[9]  Ahmet Çakir,et al.  The handbook of human–machine interaction – a human centered design approach , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  John M. O'Hara,et al.  Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model , 2004 .

[11]  Serge Debernard,et al.  Human-machine cooperation: Toward an activity regulation assistance for different air traffic control levels , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Future of Air Traffic Control: Human Operators and Automation , 1998 .

[13]  Shoshana Zuboff.  In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[14]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[15]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Trust in Technology: A Socio-Technical Perspective , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[16]  Bernard L. Cohen,et al.  Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective , 2004 .

[17]  Safety Hazard.  A WARNING! , 1925, California and western medicine.

[18]  Richard Rhodes.  Nuclear Renewal: Common Sense About Energy , 1993 .

[19]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[20]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Ten Challenges for Making Automation a "Team Player" in Joint Human-Agent Activity , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..