An offset rigid barrier-based test: equivalence to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety frontal offset impact safety test

Abstract The current Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) frontal offset impact safety assessment, which is similar to the European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP), uses a fixed deformable barrier of aluminium honeycomb construction. The IIHS offset deformable barrier (ODB), designed to mimic an average collision partner during an accident, is however a relatively expensive and time-consuming representation for evaluating the safety of a given vehicle during frontal collisions. The repeatability of tests based on ODBs has also been questioned in some investigations reported in published literature. In the current paper, available finite element models of a compact car (Dodge Neon) and a full-size car (Dodge Intrepid) were first improved and validated against actual test results reported by the IIHS. Each of these validated models was next subjected to 40% offset impact against a rigid wall in lieu of the deformable IIHS barrier at a lower speed calculated on the basis of energy balance. The simulations were carried out with the aid of the explicit code LS-DYNA. It was shown that a remarkably good correlation can be obtained for occupant compartment intrusions for impact against an offset rigid barrier vis-à-vis the IIHS ODB. Thus, at a lower speed the offset rigid barrier can be a cost-effective and efficient alternative to the currently used ODB.

[1]  A Deb,et al.  An improved representation of vehicle incompatibility in frontal NCAP tests using a modified rigid barrier , 2006 .

[2]  A M Eigen,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCCUPANT COMPARTMENT DEFORMATION AND OCCUPANT INJURY , 2004 .

[3]  Priya Prasad,et al.  Simulation of Frontal Barrier Offset Impacts and Comparison of Intrusions and Decelerations , 1995 .

[4]  M P Rapin VEHICLE STRUCTURAL CRASHWORTHINESS. STATE-OF-THE-ART , 1970 .

[5]  Koji Mizuno,et al.  Vehicle crashworthiness in full and offset frontal impact tests , 2003 .

[6]  Tomiji Sugimoto,et al.  THE OFFSET CRASH TEST - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TEST METHODS , 1998 .

[7]  Tetsuo Maki,et al.  A FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF FRONTAL OBLIQUE OFFSET IMPACTS , 2003 .

[8]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  FRONTAL IMPACTS WITH SMALL PARTIAL OVERLAP: REAL LIFE DATA FROM CRASH RECORDERS , 1998 .

[9]  William T. Hollowell,et al.  DETERMINATION OF FRONTAL OFFSET TEST CONDITIONS BASED ON CRASH DA , 1998 .

[10]  Pascal Delannoy,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Frontal Offset Tests to Control Self and Partner Protection , 2005 .

[11]  David S. Zuby,et al.  Deformable Barriers and Occupant Protection in Offset Frontal Car-to-Car Crashes , 1995 .

[12]  Farid Bendjellal,et al.  EURONCAP - Views and Suggestions for Improvements , 2001 .

[13]  Stuart Vaughan Newstead,et al.  Comparative analysis of several vehicle safety rating systems , 2001 .

[14]  Claudio Lomonaco,et al.  5-YEARS STATUS REPORT OF THE ADVANCED OFFSET FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION , 2001 .

[15]  Priya Prasad,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Various Frontal Impact Test Procedures , 1995 .

[16]  Aloke Prasad,et al.  NHTSA's Frontal Offset Research Program , 2004 .

[17]  Carl L. Ragland Offest test procedure development and comparison , 1998 .

[18]  R. Puppini,et al.  PROPOSAL FOR A NEW FRONTAL CRASH TEST PROCEDURE TO MEET SELF PROTECTION AND COMPATIBILITY NEEDS , 2000 .