Evidence for global feature superiority in menu selection by icons

Abstract A search-and-select paradigm was adopted to investigate which visual characteristics of icons are relevant for menu selection. Two icon sets (abstract icons, representational icons) were compared to a word command set. For abstract icons, global features were used in order lo maximize their visual distinctiveness. For representational icons local features were used in order to ensure a high degree of representativeness and a small “articulatory distance”. Results revealed that abstract icons were searched and selected much faster than both word commands and representational icons. In addition, response time functions indicated that abstract icons can be searched in parallel (no effect of menu size) whereas word commands and representational icons have to be searched sequentially. Error rates were small in all conditions, and there was no indication of a speed-accuracy tradeoff. Thus, when icons are used in menu selection, visual distinctiveness (due to global features) seems to override respresen...

[1]  G. Perlman.  Making the right choices with menus , 1987 .

[2]  Martin C. Maguire.  A review of human factors guidelines and techniques for the design of graphical human-computer interfaces , 1985, Comput. Graph..

[3]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  C. Morris.  Foundations of the theory of signs , 1938 .

[5]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Designing a menu-based interface to an operating system , 1985, CHI '85.

[6]  Kenneth N. Lodding,et al.  Iconic Interfacing , 1983, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  Stanley R. Parkinson,et al.  Organization of Broad Computer Menu Displays , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[8]  Kai A. Olsen,et al.  Icons in man-machine communications , 1985 .

[9]  J. R. Pomerantz.  Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  The importance of item distinctiveness on performance using a menu selection system , 1986 .

[11]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[12]  Paul Muter,et al.  The role of graphics in item selection from menus , 1986 .

[13]  H. H. Clark.  Psychology and language , 1977 .

[14]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Direct Manipulation Interfaces , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Stephen R. Ruth,et al.  The use of menus in the design of on-line sytems: a retrospective view , 1985, SGCH.

[16]  J Wandmacher,et al.  Superiority of global features in classification and matching , 1985, Psychological research.

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Georg Raeder.  A Survey of Current Graphical Programming Techniques , 1985, Computer.

[19]  Ricky E. Savage,et al.  A Multilevel menu-driven user interface: Design and evaluation through simulation , 1984 .

[20]  T. K. Landauer,et al.  Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width , 1985, CHI '85.

[21]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  On the process of comparing sentences against pictures , 1972 .