New procedure of automatic modeling of pipelines with realistic shaped corrosion defects

Abstract Corrosion is still one of the most important causes of structural failure of and incidents in pipelines. Up until now, most finite element studies have considered modelling corrosion defects as a single or multiple idealized defects and their interactions. This paper presents an original methodology that has been developed for the automatic modeling of the complex geometry needed to represent real corrosion defects, using data obtained by field inspection, and also for building an appropriate finite element mesh for these defects. This new methodology enables a more in-depth finite element analysis and uses information already available from data obtained in inspections, which are currently only used to create clusters of idealized defects. The methodology enables the structural assessment of corroded pipelines to be further improved, giving more headroom to explore pipelines affected by corrosion. The methodology was validated by non-linear failure analysis, which were compared against semi-empirical methods and experimental results. The results are very promising and the computation efficiency is attractive.

[1]  Chanyalew Taye Belachew,et al.  Strength Assessment of Corroded Pipelines — Finite Element Simulations and Parametric Studies , 2017 .

[2]  Jae-Myung Lee,et al.  Corroded pipeline failure analysis using artificial neural network scheme , 2017, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[3]  I. Faux,et al.  Computational Geometry for Design and Manufacture , 1979 .

[4]  Renato S. Motta,et al.  The development of a computational tool for generation of high quality FE models of pipelines with corrosion defects , 2017 .

[5]  Saravanan Karuppanan,et al.  Buckling Strength of Corroded Pipelines with Interacting Corrosion Defects: Numerical Analysis , 2016 .

[6]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  An automatic mesh generation scheme for plane and curved surfaces by ‘isoparametric’ co‐ordinates , 1971 .

[7]  J. N. H. Tiratsoo.  Pipeline pigging technology , 1988 .

[8]  Bin Ma,et al.  Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects , 2013 .

[9]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals , 2005 .

[10]  J. Hoffman.  Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists , 2018 .

[11]  Ashutosh Sutra Dhar,et al.  Burst pressure of corroded pipelines considering combined axial forces and bending moments , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[12]  Duane S. Cronin.  Finite Element Analysis of Complex Corrosion Defects , 2002 .

[13]  J. L. F. Freire,et al.  Burst Tests on Pipeline Containing Long Real Corrosion Defects , 2004 .

[14]  Y. Frank Cheng,et al.  Assessment by finite element modeling of the interaction of multiple corrosion defects and the effect on failure pressure of corroded pipelines , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[15]  Gerald Farin,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer aided geometric design , 1990 .

[16]  Wenxing Zhou,et al.  A new burst pressure model for thin-walled pipe elbows containing metal-loss corrosion defects , 2019 .

[17]  Zhigang Tian,et al.  A review on pipeline integrity management utilizing in-line inspection data , 2018, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[18]  J. L. F. Freire,et al.  Part 2: Experimental strain analysis of metal loss defects in pipeline , 2006 .

[19]  A. C. Benjamin,et al.  Part 4: Rupture tests of pipeline segments containing long real corrosion defects , 2007 .

[20]  Renato S. Motta,et al.  Comparative studies for failure pressure prediction of corroded pipelines , 2017 .

[21]  Edmundo Q. de Andrade,et al.  Burst Tests on Pipeline Containing Interacting Corrosion Defects , 2005 .