Impact-cutting and regenerative chatter in robotic grinding

This paper presents a study on the dynamic behavior of a flexible robot performing a grinding process. The ultimate goal is to understand whether regenerative chatter is the source of divergent vibrations observed when machining with a compliant robot. An important nonlinear characteristic of the dynamic response of the system is found and is included in the conventional approach to chatter analysis. Robotic machining is represented by a SDOF model. The steady-state response of this model to external forces is found to be repetitive impacts. The existence of this process is justified theoretically without invoking any self-exciting regenerative effect. High-speed camera observations during operation confirm the existence of such a vibro-impact process. To investigate stability, the robotic holder’s dynamic equation is excited by a forcing function representing impulse forces during cutting impacts. Response to regenerative impact cutting forces is simulated. Zones of stable/unstable cutting were identified. This suggests that the regenerative mechanism may explain the onset of divergent vibrations in the application under study. Established regenerative chatter theory predicts an extensive stable cutting zone for a flexible robotic holder. A regenerative mechanism then would not be a probable source of instability. Considering that conventional analysis is based on linear responses, the existence of vibro-impact nonlinearity is illustrated and its effect is analyzed. This results in a more realistic stable cutting zone, better matching our experience.Copyright © 2011 by ASME

[1]  Zhaoheng Liu,et al.  Dynamic model and modal testing for vibration analysis of robotic grinding process with a 6DOF flexible-joint manipulator , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[2]  B. Hazel,et al.  Robotic approach to improve turbine surface finish , 2010, 2010 1st International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry.

[3]  B. Mann,et al.  Stability of Interrupted Cutting by Temporal Finite Element Analysis , 2003 .

[4]  Jon R. Pratt,et al.  The Stability of Low Radial Immersion Milling , 2000 .

[5]  Bruce Hazel,et al.  Robotic penstock welding , 2010, 2010 1st International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry.

[6]  B. Hazel,et al.  In-situ robotic interventions in hydraulic turbines , 2010, 2010 1st International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry.

[7]  Zengxi Pan,et al.  Machining with flexible manipulator: toward improving robotic machining performance , 2005, Proceedings, 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics..

[8]  J. L. Gagne,et al.  Robotic refurbishment of gate wheel tracks , 2010, 2010 1st International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry.

[9]  Gábor Stépán,et al.  Lobes and Lenses in the Stability Chart of Interrupted Turning , 2006 .

[10]  R. J. Comparin,et al.  Non-linear frequency response characteristics of an impact pair , 1989 .

[11]  Jean-François Rigal,et al.  Tool wear detection in milling—An original approach with a non-dedicated sensor , 2010 .

[12]  J. Tlusty,et al.  Basic Non-Linearity in Machining Chatter , 1981 .

[13]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design , 2000 .

[14]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Chatter analysis of robotic machining process , 2006 .

[15]  Louis L. Whitcomb,et al.  Adaptive force control of position/velocity controlled robots: theory and experiment , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Jon R. Pratt,et al.  Stability Prediction for Low Radial Immersion Milling , 2002 .