Microbial Adaptations Within Fine‐Scale Soil Structure Alleviate Phosphorus Limitation on Carbon Sequestration Following Afforestation

Afforestation effectively sequesters atmospheric carbon (C) into soil, with the magnitude of C sequestration being constrained by soil nutrient availability, particularly phosphorus (P) derived from parent material. While microbial communities inhabited within soil aggregates can adjust their composition and metabolic activities in response to afforestation, their effects on soil P availability remain uncertain. Here, we investigated how microbial adaptations within different soil aggregate‐size fractions (fine‐scale soil structure) were upscaled to influence P availability for soil C sequestration following long‐term (around 32 years) afforestation in subtropical China. We found that afforestation generally led to lower accumulation of total P relative to C and nitrogen (N) in soil aggregates, but induced higher P‐ versus C‐ and N‐acquiring enzyme activities (i.e., lower ecoenzymatic C:P and N:P ratios) compared with the croplands. Structural equation modeling analysis further showed that ecoenzymatic C:P and N:P ratios were primarily associated with the abundance of fungi in the macroaggregates (>250 μm), but showed significant correlations with the abundance of bacteria in the <250 μm finer soil particles. These results revealed that microbial community within different soil aggregate‐size fractions developed divergent strategies to overcome P limitation on soil C sequestration and cope with soil C:N:P imbalance following afforestation. Taken together, our work underpins that fine‐scale soil structural effects are important for the mechanistic understanding of soil P availability and their impacts on C sequestration following afforestation.

[1]  T. Keenan,et al.  The limits of forest carbon sequestration , 2022, Science.

[2]  Jinyang Wang,et al.  Microbial diversity and the abundance of keystone species drive the response of soil multifunctionality to organic substitution and biochar amendment in a tea plantation , 2022, GCB Bioenergy.

[3]  T. Ziehn,et al.  Nonlinear interactions of land carbon cycle feedbacks in Earth System Models , 2021, Global change biology.

[4]  B. Fu,et al.  Accelerated increase in vegetation carbon sequestration in China after 2010: A turning point resulting from climate and human interaction , 2021, Global change biology.

[5]  C. Field,et al.  Constraints and enablers for increasing carbon storage in the terrestrial biosphere , 2021, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[6]  G. Domke,et al.  Land use and management effects on soil carbon in U.S. Lake States, with emphasis on forestry, fire, and reforestation. , 2021, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  Anping Chen,et al.  Contrasting Responses of Soil Inorganic Carbon to Afforestation in Acidic Versus Alkaline Soils , 2021, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[8]  W. Shen,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungi and phosphatase involvement in rhizosphere phosphorus transformations improves plant nutrition during subtropical forest succession , 2021 .

[9]  Xinhui Han,et al.  Adaptive pathways of soil microorganisms to stoichiometric imbalances regulate microbial respiration following afforestation in the Loess Plateau, China , 2020 .

[10]  Shouzhang Peng,et al.  Changes in soil phosphorus and its influencing factors following afforestation in Northern China , 2019, Land Degradation & Development.

[11]  Jiao Feng,et al.  Coupling and Decoupling of Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycles Across an Aridity Gradient in the Drylands of Northern China: Evidence From Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry , 2019, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[12]  S. Lewis,et al.  Regenerate natural forests to store carbon , 2019 .

[13]  Qianxi Li,et al.  Inhibited enzyme activities in soil macroaggregates contribute to enhanced soil carbon sequestration under afforestation in central China. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  J. Zscheischler,et al.  Modelling carbon sources and sinks in terrestrial vegetation. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[15]  Qianxi Li,et al.  Stimulation of nitrogen-hydrolyzing enzymes in soil aggregates mitigates nitrogen constraint for carbon sequestration following afforestation in subtropical China , 2018, Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

[16]  A. Arneth,et al.  Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land‐based climate‐change mitigation efforts , 2018, Global change biology.

[17]  I. Kögel‐Knabner,et al.  Microaggregates in soils , 2018 .

[18]  M. Rillig,et al.  Soil aggregates as massively concurrent evolutionary incubators , 2017, The ISME Journal.

[19]  Fan Yang,et al.  Alterations in soil microbial community composition and biomass following agricultural land use change , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[20]  X. Cheng,et al.  Afforestation impacts microbial biomass and its natural (13)C and (15)N abundance in soil aggregates in central China. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Ali Ebrahimi,et al.  Microbial community dynamics in soil aggregates shape biogeochemical gas fluxes from soil profiles – upscaling an aggregate biophysical model , 2016, Global change biology.

[22]  H. Lotze-Campen,et al.  Afforestation to mitigate climate change: impacts on food prices under consideration of albedo effects , 2016 .

[23]  X. Cheng,et al.  Soil microbial community and its interaction with soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following afforestation in central China. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  R. Dick Soil Enzyme Activities as Indicators of Soil Quality , 2015 .

[25]  Alan Grainger,et al.  Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 , 2015 .

[26]  E. Marín-Spiotta,et al.  Microbial community structure varies across soil organic matter aggregate pools during tropical land cover change , 2014 .

[27]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay , 2014, Ecology letters.

[28]  M. Zobel,et al.  Soil Nutrient Content Influences the Abundance of Soil Microbes but Not Plant Biomass at the Small-Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  Liming Zhou,et al.  Afforestation in China cools local land surface temperature , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage , 2014, Nature.

[31]  F. Maestre,et al.  Decoupling of soil nutrient cycles as a function of aridity in global drylands , 2013, Nature.

[32]  B. Buatois,et al.  An experimental test of the hypothesis of non-homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter-microbe system. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[33]  X. Cheng,et al.  The impact of agricultural land use changes on soil organic carbon dynamics in the Danjiangkou Reservoir area of China , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[34]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[35]  K. Kitayama,et al.  Environmental Control of Root Exudation of Low-Molecular Weight Organic Acids in Tropical Rainforests , 2012, Ecosystems.

[36]  A. Whitmore,et al.  Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance , 2012 .

[37]  Quan-fa Zhang,et al.  The South‐to‐North Water Transfer Project of China: Environmental Implications and Monitoring Strategy 1 , 2009 .

[38]  J. DeForest The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. , 2009 .

[39]  S. Horvath,et al.  WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[40]  S. Allison,et al.  Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[41]  Chengrong Chen,et al.  Impacts of grassland afforestation with coniferous trees on soil phosphorus dynamics and associated microbial processes: A review , 2008 .

[42]  M. Watt,et al.  Ecosystem carbon accretion 10 years after afforestation of depleted subhumid grassland planted with three densities of Pinus nigra , 2007 .

[43]  G. Hurtt,et al.  The contributions of land‐use change, CO2 fertilization, and climate variability to the Eastern US carbon sink , 2006 .

[44]  James B. Grace,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems , 2006 .

[45]  M. Westoby,et al.  Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[46]  K. Hedlund Soil microbial community structure in relation to vegetation management on former agricultural land , 2002 .

[47]  W. Horwath,et al.  Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or CARBON‐13 isotopic analysis , 2001 .

[48]  M. Wood,et al.  A microplate fluorimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils , 2001 .

[49]  B. Ellert,et al.  Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes , 1995 .

[50]  R. Bowman A Sequential Extraction Procedure with Concentrated Sulfuric Acid and Dilute Base for Soil Organic Phosphorus , 1989 .

[51]  L. Sommers,et al.  Determination of Total Phosphorus in Soils: A Rapid Perchloric Acid Digestion Procedure1 , 1972 .

[52]  Sheng-qiang Wang,et al.  Dynamics of soil aggregate‐related C‐N‐P stoichiometric characteristics with stand age and soil depth in Chinese fir plantations , 2022 .

[53]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global meta-analysis of soil phosphorus dynamics after afforestation. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[54]  F. Dijkstra,et al.  Sensitivities to nitrogen and water addition vary among microbial groups within soil aggregates in a semiarid grassland , 2016, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[55]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial nutrient acquisition in tropical soils , 2013, Biogeochemistry.

[56]  Kerong Zhang,et al.  Change in soil organic carbon following the ‘Grain‐for‐Green’ programme in China , 2010 .

[57]  B. Hill,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment , 2010, Nature.

[58]  S. Allison,et al.  Evolutionary-Economic Principles as Regulators of Soil Enzyme Production and Ecosystem Function , 2010 .

[59]  Gu Sheng Characteristics of Soil Erodibility in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region,Hubei Province , 2010 .

[60]  D. Read,et al.  Mycorrhizas in ecological interactions , 2008 .

[61]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[62]  United Kingdom,et al.  GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 2005 , 2005 .

[63]  J. Six,et al.  A quantification of short-term macroaggregate dynamics: influences of wheat residue input and texture , 2005 .

[64]  E. Kandeler,et al.  Exploring the enzymatic landscape: distribution and kinetics of hydrolytic enzymes in soil particle-size fractions , 2005 .

[65]  Noah Fierer,et al.  Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles , 2003 .

[66]  R. Dick,et al.  Enzymes in soil: research and developments in measuring activities. , 2002 .

[67]  David Tilman,et al.  DYNAMICS OF SOIL NITROGEN AND CARBON ACCUMULATION FOR 61 YEARS AFTER AGRICULTURAL ABANDONMENT , 2000 .

[68]  P. Wangb,et al.  Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators , 2000 .

[69]  R. Joergensen,et al.  The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: Calibration of the kEC value , 1996 .

[70]  V. W. P. van Engelen,et al.  Global and national soils and terrain digital databases (SOTER): procedures manual. , 1993 .

[71]  S. R. Olsen,et al.  Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate , 1954 .