Academic performance, publishing and peer review: peering into the twilight zone

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of published research access and peer review, considering their impacts on accounting scholarship. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on literature and publishing document review, experiential reflections and argument. Findings – The authors reveal changes in publishing formats and accessibility, the challenges of managing research quality and significance and the challenges of avoiding constraint and foreclosure of significant new knowledge and its effective dissemination. Research limitations/implications – This paper discusses the research and publishing community’s opening to new, flexible opportunities for knowledge creation and dissemination. Originality/value – The discussion challenges the status quo of traditional academic journal publication and points to an innovative future.

[1]  James Guthrie,et al.  Accounting and management research: passwords from the gatekeepers , 1998 .

[2]  R. Gray,et al.  Rites of Passage and the Self-Immolation of Academic Accounting Labour: An Essay Exploring Exclusivity versus Mutuality in Accounting Scholarship , 2002 .

[3]  James Guthrie,et al.  Requirements and Understandings for Publishing Academic Research: An Insider View , 2004 .

[4]  R. Gray,et al.  From thesis to publication , 2004 .

[5]  L. Parker,et al.  Welcome to “the rough and tumble”: Managing accounting research in a corporatised university world , 2005 .

[6]  H. Sword.  Writing higher education differently: a manifesto on style , 2009 .

[7]  Executive Summary,et al.  Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines - Executive Summary , 2010 .

[8]  L. Parker,et al.  Business schools in an age of globalization , 2010 .

[9]  L. Parker.  University corporatisation: Driving redefinition , 2011 .

[10]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Frank Truth,et al.  Pay Big to Publish Fast: Academic Journal Rackets. , 2012 .

[12]  Solmaz Filiz Karabag,et al.  Retraction, Dishonesty and Plagiarism: Analysis of a Crucial Issue for Academic Publishing, and the Inadequate Responses from Leading Journals in Economics and Management Disciplines , 2012 .

[13]  Sheila T. Cavanagh.  Living in a Digital World: Rethinking Peer Review, Collaboration, and Open Access , 2012 .

[14]  Helen Tregidga.  Biodiversity offsetting: problematisation of an emerging governance regime , 2013 .

[15]  James Hazelton.  Accounting as a human right: the case of water information , 2013 .

[16]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research , 2013 .

[17]  L. Parker.  Contemporary University Strategising: The Financial Imperative , 2013 .

[18]  James Guthrie,et al.  The virtual university: impact on Australian accounting and business education , 2013 .

[19]  O. Boiral.  Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports , 2013 .

[20]  John Dumay,et al.  Construction of research articles in the leading interdisciplinary accounting journals , 2013 .

[21]  L. Parker,et al.  The global accounting academic: what counts! , 2014 .

[22]  T. Fogarty.  A dream deferred: interdisciplinary accounting in the US , 2014 .

[23]  L. Parker,et al.  Addressing directions in interdisciplinary accounting research , 2014 .

[24]  G. Carnegie.  The present and future of accounting history , 2014 .

[25]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Are elite journals declining? , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  John Dumay,et al.  Reflections on interdisciplinary accounting research: the state of the art of intellectual capital , 2014 .

[27]  Jeffrey Unerman,et al.  Realizing the potential of interdisciplinarity in accounting research , 2014 .

[28]  Interdisciplinary accounting research in the Public Sector: Dissolving boundaries to tackle wicked problems , 2014 .

[29]  Ingrid Jeacle,et al.  Creative spaces in interdisciplinary accounting research , 2014 .

[30]  John Dumay,et al.  Writing an article for a refereed accounting journal , 2014 .

[31]  P. Altbach.  What Counts for Academic Productivity in Research Universities , 2015 .