Comparative studies of core and edge transport barrier dynamics of DIII-D and TFTR tokamak plasmas

The plasma dynamics of enhanced confinement regimes in the TFTR core and the DIII-D core and edge are compared in order to identify a common physics basis. Despite differences in transition timescale and location, as well as the sign of the radial electric field Er, observations suggest that E × B shear effects on turbulence induced transport play a dominant role in governing barrier dynamics in all cases. Fast confinement bifurcations are observed in the TFTR core enhanced reverse shear (ERS) regime and in the edge DIII-D H mode. Both show spontaneous Er shear layer formation prior to the confinement change and a negative Er well that persists as steep gradients form. These dynamics differ from those of DIII-D negative central shear (NCS) plasmas. There, slow transitions are observed when the applied torque from unidirectional beam injection is small, while faster development and more dramatic confinement improvements occur at higher applied torques. Unlike the H mode and ERS cases, the NCS core generally has a positive Er hill and no strong Er shear precursor. However, similarity experiments performed on TFTR indicate that ERS, L mode and NCS-like regimes can all be accessed in a continuous fashion by varying the E × B shear through changes in the applied torque at constant power. As in the DIII-D NCS case, core confinement in TFTR reverse shear plasmas improves slowly as co-rotation begins to dominate the determination of Er, no strong Er shear layer develops prior to that improvement, and the plasma possesses a positive Er hill. Reductions in transport with Er gradients of either sign are consistent with the picture of E × B shear suppression and decorrelation of turbulence. At fixed input power, intermediate levels of confinement improvement are achieved by varying the E × B shear with changes in the applied neutral beam torque. The data suggest that control over the plasma pressure profile in a reactor may be possible if an external source of E × B shear, such as might be applied with RF techniques, is used to modify the shear which otherwise occurs.

[1]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Electron and ion internal transport barriers in Tore Supra and JET , 1999 .

[2]  V. Lebedev,et al.  Dynamics and control of internal transport barriers in reversed shear discharges , 1998 .

[3]  G. Staebler,et al.  Effects of velocity shear and magnetic shear in the formation of core transport barriers in the DIII-D tokamak , 1998 .

[4]  M. C. Zarnstorff,et al.  POLOIDAL ROTATION IN TFTR REVERSED SHEAR PLASMAS , 1998 .

[5]  M. C. Zarnstorff,et al.  Theory of Enhanced Reversed Shear Mode in Tokamaks , 1998 .

[6]  R. Bell,et al.  Radial Electric Field Measurements in Reversed Shear Plasmas , 1998 .

[7]  E. J. Strait,et al.  Operation at high performance in optimized shear plasmas in JET , 1998 .

[8]  G. M. Staebler,et al.  Theory of internal and edge transport barriers , 1998 .

[9]  E. J. Synakowski,et al.  Formation and structure of internal and edge transport barriers , 1998 .

[10]  R. Budny,et al.  ACHIEVEMENT OF HIGH FUSION PERFORMANCE IN JT-60U REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES , 1997 .

[11]  G. Staebler,et al.  Dynamics of core transport barrier formation and expansion in the DIII-D tokamak , 1997 .

[12]  W. Houlberg,et al.  Bootstrap current and neoclassical transport in tokamaks of arbitrary collisionality and aspect ratio , 1997 .

[13]  F. C. Schüller,et al.  Electron thermal transport barrier and magnetohydrodynamic activity observed in Tokamak plasmas with negative central shear , 1997 .

[14]  R. Budny,et al.  Local transport barrier formation and relaxation in reverse-shear plasmas on the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor , 1997 .

[15]  K. H. Burrell,et al.  Effects of E×B velocity shear and magnetic shear on turbulence and transport in magnetic confinement devices , 1997 .

[16]  G. Taylor,et al.  Roles of Electric Field Shear and Shafranov Shift in Sustaining High Confinement in Enhanced Reversed Shear Plasmas on the TFTR Tokamak , 1997 .

[17]  E. Synakowski,et al.  The effect of Er on motional-Stark effect measurements of q, a new technique for measuring Er, and a test of the neoclassical Er , 1997 .

[18]  Beer,et al.  Turbulent Fluctuations in TFTR Configurations with Reversed Magnetic Shear. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[19]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Rotational and magnetic shear stabilization of magnetohydrodynamic modes and turbulence in DIII‐D high performance discharges , 1996 .

[20]  H. Shirai,et al.  Internal transport barrier with improved confinement in the JT-60U tokamak , 1996 .

[21]  Lao,et al.  Enhanced confinement and stability in DIII-D discharges with reversed magnetic shear. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[22]  V. Lebedev,et al.  Dynamics of spatiotemporally propagating transport barriers , 1995 .

[23]  Manickam,et al.  Improved confinement with reversed magnetic shear in TFTR. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[24]  S. Coda,et al.  Beyond paradigm: Turbulence, transport, and the origin of the radial electric field in low to high confinement mode transitions in the DIII-D tokamak , 1995 .

[25]  K. H. Burrell,et al.  Flow shear induced fluctuation suppression in finite aspect ratio shaped tokamak plasma , 1995 .

[26]  M. Ono,et al.  Active core profile and transport modification by application of ion Bernstein wave power in the Princeton Beta Experiment-Modification , 1995 .

[27]  P. Diamond,et al.  Dynamics of low to high (‘‘L’’ to ‘‘H’’) confinement bifurcation: Poloidal flow and ion pressure gradient evolution , 1994 .

[28]  V. Erckmann,et al.  H-mode of W7-AS stellarator , 1994 .

[29]  Liang,et al.  Self-Regulating Shear Flow Turbulence: A Paradigm for the L to H Transition. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[30]  T. Osborne,et al.  High and very high modes from energy, particle, and momentum transport models , 1994 .

[31]  E. Doyle,et al.  Physics of the L-mode to H-mode transition in tokamaks , 1992 .

[32]  R. Budny,et al.  Simulations of deuterium-tritium experiments in TFTR , 1992 .

[33]  Patrick H. Diamond,et al.  Theory of mean poloidal flow generation by turbulence , 1991 .

[34]  J. Jacquinot,et al.  H-mode confinement in JET with enhanced performance by pellet peaked density profiles , 1991 .

[35]  Burrell,et al.  Role of edge electric field and poloidal rotation in the L-H transition. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[36]  E. C. Crume,et al.  Bifurcation theory of poloidal rotation in tokamaks: A model for L-H transition. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[37]  Roberts,et al.  Magnetic field pitch-angle measurments in the PBX-M tokamak using the motional Stark effect. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[38]  S. Hirshman,et al.  Neoclassical transport of impurities in tokamak plasmas , 1981 .

[39]  Tadashi Sekiguchi,et al.  Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research , 1987 .