Re-entry analysis of critical components and materials for design-for-demise techniques

Abstract The concern caused by the rising population of space debris has increased. One of the recommended mitigation measures is the safe re-entry disposal either in a controlled or uncontrolled manner. Performing a controlled re-entry, where the spacecraft is guided down to impact in a designated zone such as the ocean or a non-populated area, complies with the mitigation standards. However, it has limitations in terms of the cost of developing and ensuring reliability of a system. Therefore, an uncontrolled re-entry can be preferred as a simpler and cheaper alternative for the disposal of space debris. To reduce the casualty area of the surviving fragments, design-for-demise techniques have been proposed. From the point of view of the design-for-demise techniques, it is significant to identify and investigate the critical components that are directly related to the casualty risk. In this paper, re-entry survivability analysis of critical components has been conducted to identify the most critical ones and to understand the effects of uncertainties on casualty risk. The material properties within elements such as the propellant tanks, balance masses and payloads that can be critical components are crucial parameters. The initial conditions, relative sizes, and aerodynamic forces are also significant. In the view of engineering design, either a change of the material or a mass/size reduction is recommended to demise the components. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to evaluate the sensitivity.

[1]  Hae-Dong Kim,et al.  Orbit, orbital lifetime, and reentry survivability estimation for orbiting objects , 2018, Advances in Space Research.

[2]  Jeffrey A. Hoffman,et al.  Spacecraft Design-for-Demise implementation strategy & decision-making methodology for low earth orbit missions , 2013 .

[3]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Demisability and survivability sensitivity to design-for-demise techniques , 2018, 1910.06397.

[4]  P. Leyland,et al.  Re-entry survival analysis and ground risk assessment of space debris considering by-products generation , 2021 .

[5]  Iv'an P'erez,et al.  Hybrid SGP4 orbit propagator , 2017 .

[6]  R. Goulard,et al.  On Catalytic Recombination Rates in Hypersonic Stagnation Heat Transfer , 1958 .

[7]  Pietro Marco Congedo,et al.  Breakup prediction under uncertainty: Application to upper stage controlled reentries from GTO orbit , 2019 .

[9]  A. Kato Comparison of national space debris mitigation standards , 2001 .

[10]  T. Lips,et al.  A comparison of commonly used re-entry analysis tools , 2005 .

[11]  S. Park,et al.  Separation Process of Spheres in Hypersonic Flows , 2018 .

[12]  R. D. Klett DRAG COEFFICIENTS AND HEATING RATIOS FOR RIGHT CIRCULAR CYLINDERS IN FREE- MOLECULAR AND CONTINUUM FLOW FROM MACH 10 TO 30 , 1964 .

[13]  Wulf Radtke Novel Manufacturing Methods for Titanium Tanks and Liners , 2006 .

[14]  Reentry survival analysis of tumbling metallic hollow cylinder , 2011 .

[15]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Spacecraft design optimisation for demise and survivability , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[16]  S. Park,et al.  Separation process of multi-spheres in hypersonic flow , 2020 .

[17]  S. Park,et al.  Experimental study of separation behavior of two bodies in hypersonic flow , 2021 .

[18]  Riccardo Bevilacqua,et al.  High fidelity model for the atmospheric re-entry of CubeSats equipped with the Drag De-Orbit Device , 2019, Acta Astronautica.

[19]  Ali Gülhan,et al.  About the demisability of propellant tanks during atmospheric re-entry from LEO , 2017 .

[20]  Toru Sato,et al.  Shape estimation of space debris using single-range Doppler interferometry , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and probabilistic re-entry modeling for debris using high dimensional model representation based uncertainty treatment , 2017 .

[22]  S. Park,et al.  Reentry trajectory and survivability estimation of small space debris with catalytic recombination , 2017 .

[23]  Jeffrey A. Hoffman,et al.  Illustrative NASA Low Earth Orbit spacecraft subsystems design-for-demise trade-offs, analyses and limitations , 2012 .

[24]  T. Lips,et al.  Upgrade of ESA's Debris Risk Assessment and Mitigation Analysis (DRAMA) tool: Spacecraft Entry Survival Analysis Module , 2017, Acta Astronautica.

[25]  Xi Qu,et al.  Space Debris Reentry Analysis Methods and Tools , 2011 .