Postural invariance in three-dimensional reaching and grasping movements

Abstract. The question of whether the final arm posture to be reached is determined in advance during prehension movements remains widely debated. To address this issue, we designed a psychophysical experiment in which human subjects were instructed to reach and grasp, with their right arm, a small sphere presented at various locations. In some trials the sphere remained stationary, while in others (the perturbed trials) it suddenly jumped, at movement onset, to a new unpredictable position. Our data indicate that the final configuration of the upper limb is highly predictable for a given location of the sphere. For movements directed at stationary objects, the variability of the final arm posture was very small in relation to the variability allowed by joint redundancy. For movements directed at "jumping" objects, the initial motor response was quickly amended, allowing an accurate grasp. The final arm posture reached at the end of the perturbed trials was neither different from nor more variable than the final arm posture reached at the end of the corresponding stationary trials (i.e. the trials sharing the same final object location). This latter result is not trivial, considering both joint redundancy and the motor reorganization imposed by the change in sphere location. In contrast to earlier observations, our data cannot be accounted for by biomechanical or functional factors. Indeed, the spherical object used in the present study did not constrain the final arm configuration or the hand trajectory. When considered together, our data support the idea that the final posture to be reached is planned in advance and used as a control variable by the central nervous system.

[1]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[2]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[3]  Morton B. Brown,et al.  Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances , 1974 .

[4]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[7]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Do neurons in the motor cortex encode movement direction? An alternative hypothesis , 1988, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[9]  J F Soechting,et al.  Parcellation of sensorimotor transformations for arm movements , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  J F Soechting,et al.  A coordinate system for the synthesis of visual and kinesthetic information , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Temporal dissociation of motor responses and subjective awareness. A study in normal subjects. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: Influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  M. Goodale,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: How delaying an action system can transform a theory , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  M. Goodale,et al.  Grasping versus pointing and the differential use of visual feedback , 1993 .

[19]  E. Komilis,et al.  Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  On the control of biologically and kinematically redundant manipulators , 1995 .

[23]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement? , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  M Desmurget,et al.  Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Loukia D. Loukopoulos,et al.  Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. , 1995, Psychological review.

[27]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Postural control of three-dimensional prehension movements. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  R. C. Miall,et al.  Multi-joint limbs permit a flexible response to unpredictable events , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  D. Pélisson,et al.  From Eye to Hand: Planning Goal-directed Movements , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[31]  P Viviani,et al.  Pointing to Kinesthetic Targets in Space , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[33]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Jean Pierre Verriest,et al.  A geometric algorithm to predict the arm reach posture for computer‐aided ergonomic evaluation , 1998 .

[35]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Viewer-centered and body-centered frames of reference in direct visuomotor transformations , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Xuguang Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of influence of hand orientation and joint limits on the control of arm postures and movements , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.