Does ERP Provide a Cross-Functional View of the Firm? Challenging Conventional Wisdom for SMEs and Large French Firms

This paper defines cross-functionality as the awareness that organizational actors have of the coupled and integrated nature of processes across various business units, which allows employees to deliver products and services to customers. That the implementation of enterprise systems (ES) provides a more complete crossfunctional view of the firm has been taken for granted by managers and researchers alike. The cross-functional potential of enterprise resource planning (ERP) is a widely-held assumption and is one approaching conventional wisdom: “Because ERPs tear down walls within organizations, they help everyone to understand their impact on an entire operation. Ultimately, companies find their staff adopting an increasingly broad enterprise perspective rather than a departmental one” (McKeen and Smith 2003, p. 143). This paper challenges this conventional wisdom that equates technical integration and socio-cognitive integration. The “impacts” of ERP systems depend on organizational context and implementation process. We show that flexibility, the primary goal of ERP adoption, as well as implementation strategy factors (organizational vision, speed, and core modules) exert a positive impact on cross-functionality in small and medium enterprises but not in large firms. These findings are obtained through a study of 100 French firms, then further illustrated and built upon by investigating two medium-size firms as opposed to two large firms. The findings suggest that large firms might have fewer problems than SMEs in bringing different business functions to be integrated into the project. Further, they also might have a larger inter-organizational scope of integration, but their ERP systems do not foster cross-functionality. There is also a need for social interaction to coordinate activities effectively. In SMEs, cross-functionality may be easier to reach with adequate implementation strategy.

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[3]  V. Mabert,et al.  The impact of organization size on enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations in the US manufacturing sector , 2003 .

[4]  Petri Hallikainen,et al.  ERP System Adoption - Does the Size Matter? , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Information technology: Threats and opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises , 1993 .

[6]  Jay R. Galbraith Competing with flexible lateral organizations , 1993 .

[7]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[8]  Thomaz Wood,et al.  Reductionism and complex thinking during ERP implementations , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[9]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects , 2003 .

[10]  Dorothy Leon Ard-Barton Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations , 1988 .

[11]  E. Eugene Schultz,et al.  Hawaii international conference on system sciences , 1992, SGCH.

[12]  Jack Cook,et al.  Promoting Organizational Knowledge Sharing , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems , 2000 .

[14]  Mark Lipton,et al.  Demystifying the Development of an Organizational Vision , 1996 .

[15]  Michel Avital,et al.  SAP implementation at Metalica: an organizational drama in two acts , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[17]  Sue Newell,et al.  Social Capital in ERP Projects: The Differential Source and Effects of Bridging and Bonding , 2002, ICIS.

[18]  Sergio Beretta,et al.  Unleashing the integration potential of ERP systems: The role of process-based performance measurement systems , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Implementing Radical Change: Gradual Versus Rapid Pace , 2018, ICIS.

[20]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  F. Caeldries Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1994 .

[22]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  ERP implementation and change: towards a cross-functional view , 2003, ECIS.

[23]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Managing the Next Wave of Enterprise Systems: Leveraging Lessons from ERP , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[24]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Dominant actors, political agendas, and strategic shifts over time: a critical ethnography of an enterprise systems implementation , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Gary L. Frankwick,et al.  Hurdle the Cross-Functional Barriers to Strategic Change , 1995 .

[26]  Anthony K. P. Wensley,et al.  Organizational memory and the completeness of process modeling in ERP systems: Some concerns, methods and directions for future research , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[27]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  Wenpin Tsai Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[29]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  The new and the old of business process redesign , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  ERP Adoption by European Midsize Companies. , 2000 .

[31]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Organizational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research , 1999, ICIS.

[32]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Angela Lin,et al.  Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[34]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[35]  Heather A. Smith,et al.  Making IT Happen: Critical Issues in IT Management , 2003 .

[36]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts , 2001, DATB.

[37]  David E. Avison,et al.  Suggestions for capturing corporate vision in strategic information systems , 1998 .

[38]  Fergal Carton,et al.  Understanding the impact of enterprise systems on management decision making: an agenda for future research , 2005 .

[39]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[40]  Prasad Bingi,et al.  Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[41]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Coping with ERP-related contextual issues in SMEs: a vendor's perspective , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Graeme Shanks,et al.  Critical Success Factors Revisited: A Model for ERP Project Implementation , 2003 .

[43]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[44]  Bryan Hattingh,et al.  The competitive advantage , 2007 .