Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces.

Other-race faces are generally recognized more poorly than own-race faces. There has been a long-standing interest in the extent to which differences in contact contribute to this other-race effect (ORE). Here, we examined the effect of contact on two distinct aspects of face memory, memory for configuration and for components, both of which are better for own-race than other-race faces. Configural and component memory were measured using recognition memory tests with intact study faces and blurred (isolates memory for configuration) and scrambled (isolates memory for components) test faces, respectively. Our participants were a large group of ethnically Chinese individuals who had resided in Australia for varying lengths of time, from a few weeks to 26 years. We found that time in a Western country significantly (negatively) predicted the size of the ORE for configural, but not component, memory. There was also a trend for earlier age of arrival to predict smaller OREs in configural, but not component, memory. These results suggest that memory for configural information in other-race faces improves with experience with such faces. However, as found for recognition memory generally, the contact effects were small, indicating that other factors must play a substantial role in cross-race differences in face memory.

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[2]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  J. F. Cross,et al.  Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces , 1971 .

[4]  H. Ellis,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Recognition Memory For Faces , 1974 .

[5]  S. Feinman,et al.  Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. , 1976, Child development.

[6]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[7]  J. Brigham,et al.  Accuracy of Eyewitness Identifications in a Field Setting , 1982 .

[8]  J. Brigham,et al.  Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting. , 1982 .

[9]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[10]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  M. Rodin.  Who Is Memorable to Whom: A Study of Cognitive Disregard , 1987 .

[12]  R. Bruyer,et al.  Features of laterally displayed faces: saliency or top-down processing? , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[13]  G. Rhodes.  Looking at Faces: First-Order and Second-Order Features as Determinants of Facial Appearance , 1988, Perception.

[14]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Person Categorization and Stereotyping , 1990 .

[16]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[17]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Simulating the ‘Other-race Effect* as a Problem in Perceptual Learning , 1991 .

[18]  T. Valentine,et al.  Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  T. Valentine,et al.  An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition , 1995 .

[21]  D. Levin.  CLASSIFYING FACES BY RACE : THE STRUCTURE OF FACE CATEGORIES , 1996 .

[22]  S. J. Stroessner.  Social categorization by race or sex: Effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. , 1996 .

[23]  Christian A. Meissner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites , 2000 .

[24]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[25]  D. Levin.  Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Christian A. Meissner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites , 2000 .

[27]  Bonnie L. Angelone,et al.  Visual search for a socially defined feature: What causes the search asymmetry favoring cross-race faces? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. , 2001 .

[29]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[30]  C. Tredoux,et al.  A field study of own-race bias in South Africa and England. , 2001 .

[31]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. , 2001 .

[32]  G. Rhodes,et al.  'They all look alike to me': prejudice and cross-race face recognition. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[33]  David K. A. Barnes,et al.  correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[34]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[35]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[38]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Role of Featural and Configural Information in Familiar and Unfamiliar Face Recognition , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[40]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Expert face processing: specialisation and constraints , 2003 .

[41]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  What Are the Routes to Face Recognition , 2003 .

[42]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Do we all look alike to computers? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[44]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[46]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[47]  C. Pallier,et al.  Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood , 2005, Psychological science.

[48]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[49]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[50]  Peter J. Hills,et al.  Short Article: Reducing the Own-Race Bias in Face Recognition by Shifting Attention , 2006 .

[51]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2006 .

[52]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  They All Look the Same to Me (Unless They're Angry) , 2006, Psychological science.

[54]  H. Abdi,et al.  Simulating the ‘Other-Race’ Effect with Autoassociative Neural Networks: Further Evidence in Favor of the Face-Space Model , 2006, Perception.

[55]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  A perceptual discrimination investigation of the own-race effect and intergroup experience , 2006 .

[56]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Nature and Nurture in Own-Race Face Processing , 2006, Psychological science.

[57]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Race Categorization Modulates Holistic Face Encoding , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Familiar Other-Race Faces Show Normal Holistic Processing and are Robust to Perceptual Stress , 2007, Perception.

[59]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  The Cross-Category Effect , 2007, Psychological science.

[60]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit : Toward a solution to an insidious problem , 2007 .

[61]  G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition , 2008, Cognition.

[62]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[63]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Race Coding and the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition , 2009, Perception.