Abstraction and generalization in conceptual design process: involving safety principles in TRIZ-SDA environment

Abstraction and generalization are the processes of facilitating a specific problem to help designers solve problems efficiently. Abstraction and generalization reduce complexity and increase creativity. Both abstraction and generalization guide designers to focus on the key factors of a problem towards producing a broader solution perspective. This paper aims to discuss the use of abstraction and generalization in the conceptual design process within the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) environment, specifically, in TRIZ-SDA (Systematic Design Approach), which was developed to increase the understanding of safety principles in the conceptual design process. In addition, the aspects of abstraction and generalization advantages, their implementation in the design process, safety constraints and comparisons between abstraction and generalization are also reviewed. A case study of an aircraft component is used as the example in conducting abstraction and generalization in the safety approach.

[1]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Model and algorithm for computer-aided inventive problem analysis , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Denis Cavallucci,et al.  From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: addressing complexity challenges in inventive design , 2007 .

[3]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Generating implications for design through design research , 2014, CHI.

[4]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Theorizing in Design Science Research , 2011, DESRIST.

[5]  John R. Hayes,et al.  The Complete Problem Solver , 1981 .

[6]  James R. Rinderle,et al.  Models and abstractions in design , 1991 .

[7]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 1996 .

[8]  Darrell Mann,et al.  Hands-on systematic innovation , 2002 .

[9]  K. Weick What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[10]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Reflection, Abstraction And Theorizing In Design And Development Research , 2013, ECIS.

[11]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  Theorizing in Design Science Research: an Abstraction Layers Framework , 2014, PACIS.

[12]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  TRIZ-based Anticipatory Design of Future Products and Processes , 2012, J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci..

[13]  Keith Ridgway,et al.  Modelling the Conceptual Design Process with Hybridization of TRIZ Methodology and Systematic Design Approach , 2015 .

[14]  Hernan Casakin,et al.  Metaphors in Design Problem Solving: Implications for Creativity , 2007 .

[15]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[16]  Robert Folger,et al.  Theorizing as the Thickness of Thin Abstraction , 1999 .

[17]  Anthony A. Aaby,et al.  Introduction to Programming Languages , 2004 .

[18]  R. Strattona,et al.  Systematic innovation and the underlying principles behind TRIZ and TOC , 2010 .