Brain Connectivity Hyper-Network for MCI Classification

Brain connectivity network has been used for diagnosis and classification of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) as well as its early stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, conventional connectivity network is usually constructed based on the pairwise correlation among brain regions and thus ignores the higher-order relationship among them. Such information loss is unexpected because the brain itself is a complex network and the higher-order interaction may contain useful information for classification. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose a new brain connectivity hyper-network based method for MCI classification. Here, the connectivity hyper-network denotes a network where an edge can connect more than two brain regions, which can be naturally represented with a hyper-graph. Specifically, we first construct connectivity hyper-networks from the resting-state fMRI time series using sparse representation modeling. Then, we extract three sets of the brain-region specific features from the connectivity hyper-networks, and exploit a manifold regularized multi-task feature selection method to jointly select the most discriminative features. Finally, we use multi-kernel support vector machine (SVM) for classification. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method for MCI classification with comparison to the conventional connectivity network based methods.

[1]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Identification of MCI Using Optimal Sparse MAR Modeled Effective Connectivity Networks , 2013, MICCAI.

[3]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Prediction of MCI to AD conversion, via MRI, CSF biomarkers, and pattern classification , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[4]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Multimodal classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  Debra Goldberg,et al.  Clustering Coefficients in Protein Interaction Hypernetworks , 2013, BCB.

[6]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Integration of Network Topological and Connectivity Properties for Neuroimaging Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Self-gated Radial MRI for Respiratory Motion Compensation on Hybrid PET/MR Systems , 2013, MICCAI.

[8]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Morris,et al.  Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[10]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease , 2007, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[11]  Andrea Parolin Jackowski,et al.  Cerebellar volume in patients with dementia. , 2011, Revista brasileira de psiquiatria.

[12]  Jing Li,et al.  Learning brain connectivity of Alzheimer's disease by sparse inverse covariance estimation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning with Hypergraphs: Clustering, Classification, and Embedding , 2006, NIPS.

[14]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Manifold Regularized Multi-Task Feature Selection for Multi-Modality Classification in Alzheimer's Disease , 2013, MICCAI.

[15]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  The Parahippocampal Gyrus in Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical and Preclinical Neuroanatomical Correlates , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.