The effects of visual imagery on face identification: an ERP study

The present study tested the hypothesis that the effects of mental imagery on subsequent perception occur at a later matching stage in perceptual identification, but not in the early perceptual stage as in perceptual detection. The behavioral results suggested that the effect of visual imagery on visual identification is content-specific, i.e., imagining a congruent face facilitates face identification, whereas a mismatch between imagery and perception leads to an interference effect. More importantly, the ERP results revealed that a more negative N2 response to the subsequent visual face stimuli was elicited over fronto-central sites in the mismatch and no-imagery conditions as compared to that in the match condition, with the early P1 and N170 components independent of manipulations. The latency and distribution of the neural effects demonstrate that the matching step, but not the earlier perceptual process, is affected by the preceding visual imagery in the context of face identification. We discuss these results in a broader context that the imagery-perception interaction may depend on task demand.

[1]  Marianna D. Eddy,et al.  Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials: a new approach for tracking the time-course of object perception. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[2]  M J Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Samuel T. Moulton,et al.  Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  O. Koenig,et al.  On the relationship between visual imagery and visual perception: Evidence from priming studies , 2002 .

[5]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  The Influence of Stimulus Deviance on Electrophysiologic and Behavioral Responses to Novel Events , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  M. J. Peterson,et al.  Visual detection and visual imagery. , 1974, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[7]  R. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  H L Roediger,et al.  Effects of imagery on perceptual implicit memory tests. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Visual Imagery: Effects of Short- and Long-Term Memory , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M E Arterberry,et al.  Imagery-induced interference on a visual detection task. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[11]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Effects of perceived and imagined odors on taste detection. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[12]  M. Farah,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a shared representational medium for mental images and percepts. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  C. Gilbert Plasticity in visual perception and physiology , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Z. Pylyshyn Mental imagery: In search of a theory , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Giorgio Ganis,et al.  Visual mental imagery and perception produce opposite adaptation effects on early brain potentials , 2008, NeuroImage.

[18]  D. Sagi,et al.  Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. , 1995, Science.

[19]  Frank Tong,et al.  The Functional Impact of Mental Imagery on Conscious Perception , 2008, Current Biology.

[20]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Invariance to rotation in depth measured by masked repetition priming is dependent on prime duration , 2011, Brain Research.

[21]  M. Petrides,et al.  The Mind's Nose , 2004, Psychological science.

[22]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation and face perception , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  A Reeves,et al.  Effects of imagery on vernier acuity under conditions of induced depth. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[26]  S. J. Segal,et al.  Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Kartik K. Sreenivasan,et al.  Temporal Characteristics of Top-Down Modulations during Working Memory Maintenance: An Event-related Potential Study of the N170 Component , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Cheves West Perky An Experimental study of imagination. , 1910 .

[29]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[31]  Luo Yuejia,et al.  Revision of the Chinese Facial Affective Picture System , 2011 .

[32]  M J Farah,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[34]  M M Mesulam,et al.  An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Akamatsu Shigeru,et al.  Investigating the Relation between Imagery and Perception: Evidence from Face Priming , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  A. Reeves,et al.  Visual imagery lowers sensitivity to hue-varying, but not to luminance-varying, visual stimuli , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  A Reeves,et al.  Visual Imagery Selectively Reduces Vernier Acuity , 1987, Perception.

[38]  X. Mai,et al.  Effects of discrepancy between imagined and perceived sounds on the N2 component of the event-related potential. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Enhancement of conflict processing activity in human brain under task relevant condition , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  R A Finke,et al.  Facilitation of length discrimination using real and imaged context frames. , 1984, The American journal of psychology.

[41]  W. Singer,et al.  Neuroelectromagnetic Correlates of Perceptual Closure Processes , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[43]  R A Finke,et al.  Some consequences of visualization in pattern identification and detection. , 1986, The American journal of psychology.

[44]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  X. Mai,et al.  Pitch and loudness information encoded in auditory imagery as revealed by event-related potentials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[46]  D. Sagi,et al.  From the National Institutes of Health. , 1993, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).