Identification of effective factors to select energy recovery technologies from municipal solid waste using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): A review of thermochemical technologies

Abstract Thermochemical technologies used to burn municipal solid waste are one of the relatively new and appropriate methods for waste management. By burning waste, heat and gases have arisen which can be used as the energy source to generate electricity. Due to the high cost, pollution emissions and diversity of such power plants, comprehensive studies are required. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the thermal methods in the field of waste management and to optimum for the most suitable methods. The selected thermochemical technologies include incineration, gasification, plasma, and pyrolysis. Data gathering was done through a questionnaire completed by experts. The decision-making models based on the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods are proposed to select the best thermochemical technology by the technical, economic, and environmental criteria. Ultimately, the environmental criteria (0.355), economic criteria (0.338) and, technical criteria (0.307) were introduced as the most effective criterion in choosing thermal methods respectively. The results of both AHP and TOPSIS models showed that the plasma method is the optimal thermochemical technology in terms of three existing criteria. Incinerator, gasification, and pyrolysis systems were ranked next.

[1]  Ebru Akcapinar Sezer,et al.  A modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) approach for decision support systems in natural hazard assessments , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  S. A. Mangi,et al.  Municipal Solid Waste Management Practices and Opportunities in Saudi Arabia , 2019, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research.

[3]  P. Anand Raj,et al.  Entropy-based fuzzy TOPSIS framework for selection of a sustainable building material , 2019, International Journal of Construction Management.

[4]  Y. Zhao,et al.  Machine Learning-Enabled Competitive Grain Growth Behavior Study in Directed Energy Deposition Fabricated Ti6Al4V , 2019, JOM.

[5]  Sunil Kumar,et al.  Waste Treatment Processes/Technologies for Energy Recovery , 2019, Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

[6]  M. Hrabovský,et al.  Plasma Waste Destruction , 2017 .

[7]  R. Sakthivel,et al.  Multi-attribute decision-making approach for Aegle marmelos pyrolysis process using TOPSIS and Grey Relational Analysis: Assessment of engine emissions through novel Infrared thermography , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Dan Han,et al.  Application of thermal plasma technology for the treatment of solid wastes in China: An overview. , 2016, Waste management.

[9]  David Jaramillo,et al.  Waste-To-Energy Technologies: an opportunity of energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste, using Quito - Ecuador as case study , 2017 .

[10]  Yuanhui Zhang,et al.  Gasification of biowaste: A critical review and outlooks , 2018 .

[11]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[12]  Production of syngas, synfuel, bio-oils, and biogas from coal, biomass, and opportunity fuels , 2016 .

[13]  L. Lombardi,et al.  Analysis of energy recovery potential using innovative technologies of waste gasification. , 2012, Waste management.

[14]  Ali Dag,et al.  An AHP-IFT Integrated Model for Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Web Sites , 2018, Information Systems Frontiers.

[15]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Environmental impact of incineration of calorific industrial waste: rotary kiln vs. cement kiln. , 2010, Waste management.

[16]  Abdullahil Azeem,et al.  Selection of an appropriate waste-to-energy conversion technology for Dhaka City, Bangladesh , 2017 .

[17]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  A group decision making model based on an inconsistency index of interval multiplicative reciprocal matrices , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Myung Won Seo,et al.  Pyrolysis characteristics of coal and RDF blends in non-isothermal and isothermal conditions , 2010 .

[19]  Dileep Singh,et al.  Binder jetting additive manufacturing of silicon carbide ceramics: Development of bimodal powder feedstocks by modeling and experimental methods , 2020, Ceramics International.