Threat determines affective startle potentiation

Affective startle modulation often is attributed to the valence dimension of applied foreground stimuli, whereas alternative views refer to specific discrete emotions. Based on the idea of the startle reflex being a protective mechanism, the significance of threat to the acoustic startle response was tested. Affectively charged pictures were selected according to their quantified discrete-emotional distinctness: pictures primarily evoking sadness, anger, and disgust (low valence); pictures primarily evoking fear (threat; moderately low valence); and pictures primarily evoking happiness (high valence). Electromyography (EMG) of the orbicularis oculi muscle revealed substantial startle potentiation by the fear evoking stimuli. Moreover, evidence was found that disgust bears a strong relation to the startle reflex. In line with other recent studies the reported findings suggest that startle is being increased by threat to one's physical integrity, as is signaled by the discrete emotions of fear and disgust.

[1]  M. Bradley,et al.  Startle reflex modification: emotion or attention? , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Terry M. Libkuman,et al.  Multidimensional normative ratings for the International Affective Picture System , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Christian Grillon,et al.  A review of the modulation of the startle reflex by affective states and its application in psychiatry , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Bradley,et al.  Startle Modification: Affect and the Startle Reflex , 1999 .

[5]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotional reactions in children: verbal, physiological, and behavioral responses to affective pictures. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Sara E. Morrison,et al.  Re-valuing the amygdala , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  David L. Walker,et al.  Opposing roles of the amygdala and dorsolateral periaqueductal gray in fear-potentiated startle , 1997, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. , 1990, Psychological review.

[9]  A. Anokhin,et al.  Startle modulation by affective faces , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[10]  R. Veit,et al.  The human amygdala is sensitive to the valence of pictures and sounds irrespective of arousal: an fMRI study. , 2008, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[11]  A. Kemp The corneal reflex. , 1959, Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica.

[12]  H. Merckelbach,et al.  Disgust and spider phobia. , 1996, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Michael Davis,et al.  Anxiety and the Amygdala: Pharmacological and Anatomical Analysis of the Fear-Potentiated Startle Paradigm , 1988 .

[15]  J. S. Brown,et al.  Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  R. Stark,et al.  The insula is not specifically involved in disgust processing: an fMRI study , 2002, Neuroreport.

[17]  P. Lang International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[18]  Christopher J Patrick,et al.  Effects of picture content and intensity on affective physiological response. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[19]  C. Patrick,et al.  Affective imagery and the startle response: probing mechanisms of modulation during pleasant scenes, personal experiences, and discrete negative emotions. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[20]  G. Alpers,et al.  Spiders are special: fear and disgust evoked by pictures of arthropods , 2009 .

[21]  L. Hawk,et al.  Addressing the specificity of affective startle modulation: fear versus disgust , 2002, Biological Psychology.

[22]  Eyeblink startle responses in spider phobies before and after treatment: A pilot study , 1991 .