Modelling the mixed-mode failure of cement¿bone interfaces

Abstract The main purpose of this study is the development of a failure model for the cement–bone interface in cemented hip prostheses. The model includes the mechanical behaviour of the cement–bone interface under mixed-mode loading, reproducing the initial linear behaviour up to a certain stress level, followed by an exponential strain-softening region. Four parameters for each stress mode (tension and shear) must be defined in order to fully characterize this mechanical behaviour: the interface strength t0, the initial stiffness K0, the interface displacement corresponding to full debonding of the interface δc and the failure energy Gc. To validate the potential of the associated numerical model, several tests were simulated, obtaining results close to the experimental ones. This formulation was also applied to simulate a more biomechanical although still academic problem: the debonding evolution of the bone–cement interface of the Exeter total hip arthroplasty system, including fatigue failure of the interface. We conclude that the mixed-mode failure interface model here proposed allows for more realistic simulations of the debonding process of cement–bone interfaces.

[1]  K. Mann,et al.  A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M J Allen,et al.  Mixed‐mode failure response of the cement–bone interface , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  F. Sidoroff,et al.  Damage Induced Elastic Anisotropy , 1982 .

[4]  M J Allen,et al.  Pre‐yield and post‐yield shear behavior of the cement‐bone interface , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  P. Walker Human joints and their artificial replacements , 1977 .

[6]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues , 2001 .

[7]  M Doblaré,et al.  Application of an anisotropic bone-remodelling model based on a damage-repair theory to the analysis of the proximal femur before and after total hip replacement. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Amos Race,et al.  Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. M. Garcı́a,et al.  Anisotropic bone remodelling model based on a continuum damage-repair theory. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  M H Stone,et al.  Some factors affecting the strength of the cement-metal interface. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  W J Maloney,et al.  The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  K. Mann,et al.  Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement–bone interface , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  F W Werner,et al.  Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  W H Harris,et al.  The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Jean Lemaitre,et al.  A Course on Damage Mechanics , 1992 .

[17]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  W J Maloney,et al.  Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Anisotropic Solids , 1984 .

[20]  T. Bauer,et al.  The pathology of total joint arthroplasty , 1999, Skeletal Radiology.

[21]  W H Harris,et al.  Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement‐Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements? , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  W. Hozack,et al.  Failure of the cement-bone interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface? , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  D L Bartel,et al.  Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Analysis of the debonding of the stem–cement interface in intramedullary fixation using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach , 2005 .

[26]  F W Werner,et al.  Modeling the tensile behavior of the cement-bone interface using nonlinear fracture mechanics. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Fornasier Vl,et al.  The femoral stem/cement interface in total hip replacement. , 1976 .

[28]  S. Woo,et al.  Regional variation in shear strength of the bone-polymethylmethacrylate interface. , 1987, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  K. Mann,et al.  Predicting the failure response of cement-bone constructs using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  J. Lemaître A CONTINUOUS DAMAGE MECHANICS MODEL FOR DUCTILE FRACTURE , 1985 .

[31]  J L Lewis,et al.  A model of tension and compression cracks with cohesive zone at a bone-cement interface. , 1985, Journal of biomechanical engineering.