Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion

Measurement of knowledge spillovers remains an important challenge. While patent citation analyses are one common empirical approach, questions persist about their efficacy and potential biases. In an effort to assess various measures of knowledge diffusion, this paper compares patent data surrounding recombinant DNA technology to licenses and publications building on the same technology. Evaluation of these measures highlights errors of both omission and over-representation in each measure, and reveals potential biases tied to organizational age and location. The results suggest that studies of knowledge diffusion can be strengthened dramatically by drawing upon multiple indicators.

[1]  M. Gittelman,et al.  A Note on the Value of Patents as Indicators of Innovation: Implications for Management Research , 2008 .

[2]  Jeannette A. Colyvas.  From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University , 2007 .

[3]  M. Gittelman.  Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior , 2006 .

[5]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[7]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis , 1996, Scientometrics.

[8]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[9]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .

[10]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[11]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Megan MacGarvie,et al.  How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys , 2005 .

[13]  Petra Moser,et al.  How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World Fairs , 2003 .

[14]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[15]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[16]  J. Kesan.  Carrots and Stickes to Create a Better Patent System , 2002 .

[17]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Ulrich Kaiser.  Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches , 2002 .

[19]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[20]  S S Hughes,et al.  Making Dollars out of DNA: The First Major Patent in Biotechnology and the Commercialization of Molecular Biology, 1974-1980 , 2001, Isis.

[21]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis , 2001 .

[22]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[23]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[24]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[25]  B. Cronin,et al.  The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield , 2000 .

[26]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform , 1999 .

[27]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: an exploration of CIS micro data , 1999 .

[28]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents , 1998 .

[29]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[30]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[31]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[32]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[33]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[34]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[35]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment , 1992 .

[36]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[37]  Z. Griliches.  The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[38]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[39]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[40]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[41]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity , 1989 .

[42]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[43]  H. Zuckerman.  The sociology of science. , 1988 .

[44]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Markets Valuation of R&D and Patents , 1987 .

[45]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[46]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[47]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[48]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Study of the Formal Level , 1986 .

[49]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  The propensity to patent , 1983 .

[50]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Technological change in the Norwegian whaling industry: A case-study in the use of patent-statistics as a technology indicator☆ , 1982 .

[51]  D. Edge.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review , 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[52]  James Chase.  Tiger by the Tail , 1977 .

[53]  A. C. Chang,et al.  Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  H. G. Fox,et al.  Inventions, Patents and Monopoly , 1947 .