Redundant Symmetry Influences Perceptual Grouping (as Measured by Rotational Linkage)

Symmetry detection has long been a major focus of perception research. However, although symmetry is often cited as a “grouping principle”, the effect of symmetry on grouping, an important form of perceptual organization, has been little measured. In past research, we found little spatio-temporal grouping for oblique lines symmetric around a horizontal axis during ambiguous rotary motion in depth. Grouping was measured by the degree to which the ambiguous motion direction was resolved for two elements in common (rotational linkage). We hypothesized that symmetry-based grouping would be stronger if symmetry was redundant i.e., carried by elements of greater complexity. Using the rotational linkage measure, we compared grouping for horizontally symmetric simple oblique lines and for lines composed of multiple conjoined orientations and found greater grouping for the more complex symmetric lines. A control experiment ruled out possible confounding factors and also showed a grouping effect of vertically aligned endpoints. We attribute the stronger grouping effect of redundant symmetry to the fact that it has a lower probability than does simple symmetry of arising from an accidental environmental arrangement.

[1]  Andrew J. Mojica,et al.  Display-wide influences on figure–ground perception: The case of symmetry , 2014, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[2]  B. Gillam Perceived common rotary motion of ambiguous stimuli as a criterion of perceptual grouping , 1972 .

[3]  Gert van der Vloed,et al.  Blobs strengthen repetition but weaken symmetry , 2003, Vision Research.

[4]  D W Eby,et al.  Perceptual Linkage of Multiple Objects Rotating in Depth , 1989, Perception.

[5]  P J Locher,et al.  Effects of Element Type and Spatial Grouping on Symmetry Detection , 1993, Perception.

[6]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[7]  Matthias S. Treder,et al.  Symmetry versus repetition in cyclopean vision: A microgenetic analysis , 2007, Vision Research.

[8]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[9]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  Orientation relative to the retina determines perceptual organization , 1979 .

[10]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION Simplicity and Likelihood Principles , 1986 .

[11]  Rick Gurnsey,et al.  Bilateral symmetry embedded in noise is detected accurately only at fixation , 1998, Vision Research.

[12]  B. Gibson,et al.  Must Figure-Ground Organization Precede Object Recognition? An Assumption in Peril , 1994 .

[13]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  An Electrophysiological Index of Perceptual Goodness , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  B. Gillam,et al.  Aggregation and Unit Formation in the Perception of Moving Collinear Lines , 1984, Perception.

[16]  M Kubovy,et al.  Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: the way a lock-and-key process works. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[17]  B Gillam,et al.  Motion capture by a frame: Global or local processing? , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  B. Gillam Separation relative to length determines the organization of two lines into a unit. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Walter Gerbino,et al.  Convexity and Symmetry in Figure-Ground Organization , 1976 .

[21]  H Barlow,et al.  Redundancy reduction revisited , 2001, Network.

[22]  C W Tyler,et al.  Empirical aspects of symmetry perception. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[23]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[24]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Salience of Vertical Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[25]  Jon Driver,et al.  Perception of symmetry and repetition within and across visual shapes: Part-descriptions and object-based attention , 2001 .

[26]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  The role of vertical mirror symmetry in visual shape detection. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[27]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Formation of visual “objects” in the early computation of spatial relations , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.