Linking Endogenous Factor Xa Activity, a Biologically Relevant Pharmacodynamic Marker, to Edoxaban Plasma Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial

Background: We previously reported exogenous antifactor Xa (FXa) activity as a pharmacokinetic surrogate marker for edoxaban plasma concentrations. Inhibition of endogenous FXa activity is a more biologically relevant pharmacodynamic measure of edoxaban activity. Here we describe the value of endogenous FXa activity as a pharmacodynamic marker linking edoxaban concentrations and clinical outcomes in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study 48). Methods: In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, edoxaban was administered in higher dose (60/30 mg QD) and lower dose (30/15 mg QD) regimens. Both regimens incorporated a 50% dose reduction in patients with characteristics known to increase edoxaban concentration. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling was performed in a subgroup of 3029 patients who had samples collected for endogenous FXa activity (measured using an assay after endogenous FX was activated with Russell viper venom). Results: Endogenous FXa activity decreased with increasing edoxaban concentrations of ⩽440 ng/mL, indicating that inhibition of endogenous FXa activity is saturated above this concentration threshold. Baseline endogenous FXa activity averaged 92.1±20.9% (relative to normal control samples) and was lower with older age, with lower body weight, and in male patients. Model-predicted 24-hour average percentages of inhibition of endogenous FXa activity were 35.8±5.18, 29.1±3.92, 21.9±3.80, and 16.4±2.70 for the higher dose edoxaban regimen 60 mg, dose-reduced higher dose edoxaban regimen 30 mg, lower dose edoxaban regimen 30 mg, and dose-reduced lower dose edoxaban regimen 15 mg groups, respectively. A greater average percentage of inhibition of endogenous FXa activity was associated with a lower incidence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and a higher risk of major bleeding (P<0.001). In a typical subject, the predicted risks for the 10th and 90th percentiles of inhibition of endogenous FXa activity were 1.04% and 0.57% for incidence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and 1.35% and 2.33% for major bleeding, respectively. Conclusions: The extent of inhibition of endogenous FXa activity is influenced by edoxaban dosing and clinical characteristics, and it is associated with both antithrombotic benefit and risk of bleeding. This approach of linking endogenous FXa activity to clinical outcomes may be used to guide dose selection in future clinical trials, monitor patients in certain clinical scenarios, or refine the doses of oral FXa inhibitors in patients who require precise anticoagulation therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.

[1]  F. Lee,et al.  Bioavailability and Safety of the Factor Xa Inhibitor Edoxaban and the Effects of Quinidine in Healthy Subjects , 2013, Clinical pharmacology in drug development.

[2]  T. Buclin,et al.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Imatinib , 2012, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[3]  V. Fuster,et al.  Antithrombotic effects of factor Xa inhibition with DU-176b: Phase-I study of an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor using an ex-vivo flow chamber , 2007, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[4]  F. Rosendaal,et al.  Thrombosis in the Young: Epidemiology and Risk Factors. A Focus on Venous Thrombosis , 1997, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[5]  T. Shibano,et al.  DU‐176b, a potent and orally active factor Xa inhibitor: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profiles , 2008, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[6]  E. Antman,et al.  Cardiovascular Biomarker Score and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Subanalysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[7]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Randomized, multicenter, warfarin-controlled phase II study of edoxaban in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. , 2012, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[8]  J. Vilo,et al.  DosOpt: A Tool for Personalized Bayesian Dose Adjustment of Vancomycin in Neonates , 2017, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[9]  P. Dobesh,et al.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Understanding Differences and Similarities , 2015, Drugs.

[10]  Raymond Miller,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose–Exposure Proportionality of Edoxaban in Healthy Volunteers , 2014, Clinical Drug Investigation.

[11]  N. Holford A Time to Event Tutorial for Pharmacometricians , 2013, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[12]  E. Antman,et al.  Modelling and simulation of edoxaban exposure and response relationships in patients with atrial fibrillation , 2012, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[13]  Comparison of 12 Risk Stratification Schemes to Predict Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 2008, Stroke.

[14]  E. Antman,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF–TIMI 48 Trial , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[15]  G. Wool,et al.  Pathology consultation on anticoagulation monitoring: factor X-related assays. , 2013, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  M. Laposata,et al.  Test of the month: The chromogenic antifactor Xa assay , 2012, American journal of hematology.

[17]  H. Masumoto,et al.  Clinical Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the Novel Factor Xa Inhibitor Edoxaban in Healthy Volunteers , 2010, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[18]  E. Antman,et al.  Concomitant Use of Single Antiplatelet Therapy With Edoxaban or Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis From the ENGAGE AF‐TIMI48 Trial , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[19]  E. Antman,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  J. Mendell,et al.  A randomized trial of the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, following a switch from warfarin. , 2013, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[21]  J. Weitz,et al.  Coagulation assays. , 2005, Circulation.

[22]  Raymond Miller,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Edoxaban in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study, a Phase III Clinical Trial , 2016, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[23]  Anna-Karin Hamberg,et al.  A Bayesian decision support tool for efficient dose individualization of warfarin in adults and children , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[24]  G. Raskob,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of the novel factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: design and rationale for the Effective aNticoaGulation with factor xA next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48). , 2010, American heart journal.

[26]  E. Antman,et al.  Association between edoxaban dose, concentration, anti-Factor Xa activity, and outcomes: an analysis of data from the randomised, double-blind ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[27]  R. Kim,et al.  Importance of pharmacokinetic profile and variability as determinants of dose and response to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. , 2013, The Canadian journal of cardiology.