The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective

This paper sets out to demonstrate how the triple-helix model enables us to study the knowledge base of an urban economy in terms of its civil society's support for the evolution of the city as a key component of an innovation system. It argues that cities can be considered as densities in networks among three relevant dynamics: the intellectual capital of universities, the wealth creation of industries, and the democratic government of civil society. It goes on to suggest that these interactions generate dynamic spaces within cities where knowledge can be exploited to bootstrap the technology of regional innovation systems. These dynamic spaces can best be understood as spaces of ubiquitous information and communication technologies (ICT) where knowledge is key to regional innovation systems, creating the notion of “smart cities.”

[1]  Anders Broström,et al.  The Triple Helix : University-industry-government innovation in action , 2011 .

[2]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  Empowering a State's Development of a Knowledge Society: A Retrospective Assessment of the Karnataka Knowledge Commission , 2011 .

[3]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  ‘Meaning’ as a sociological concept: A review of the modeling, mapping and simulation of the communication of knowledge and meaning , 2010, ArXiv.

[4]  LeydesdorffLoet The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens' structuration theory and Luhmann's self-organization , 2010 .

[5]  Dr Tony McCall,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems , 2010 .

[6]  Anna-Lisa Müller | Bielefeld Graduate School in History and Sociology | anna-lisa.mueller@uni-bielefeld.de Creative cities as built places of the knowledge society , 2010 .

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level , 2009, 0912.3101.

[8]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009 .

[10]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The non-linear dynamics of meaning processing in social systems , 2009, 0911.1037.

[11]  Cyril Aydon Insatiable Curiosity: Innovation in a Fragile Future , 2009, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[12]  Mark Deakin,et al.  The IntelCities Community of Practice: The eGov Services Model for Socially Inclusive and Participatory Urban Regeneration Programs , 2009 .

[13]  Nikolaos Komninos,et al.  Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks , 2008 .

[14]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[15]  A. Amin,et al.  Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice , 2008 .

[16]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action , 2008 .

[17]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Knowledge intensive firms, communities and creative cities , 2008 .

[18]  H. Nowotny Insatiable Curiosity: Innovation in a Fragile Future , 2008 .

[19]  Mark Deakin,et al.  Urban Regeneration and Sustainable Communities: The Role of Networks, Innovation, and Creativity in Building Successful Partnerships , 2007 .

[20]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage , 2009, 0911.3425.

[21]  Balázs Lengyel,et al.  A külföldi érdekeltségű vállalkozások és az egyetemek kapcsolatai Győrött, Miskolcon és Szegeden , 2006 .

[22]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics, Research Policy (forthcoming). , 2006, 0911.3412.

[23]  R. Florida,et al.  Creativity, Connections and Innovation: A Study of Linkages in the Montréal Region , 2006 .

[24]  B. Carlsson Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[25]  A. Inzelt,et al.  The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition , 2004 .

[26]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[27]  Antony M. Jose,et al.  The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment , 2001, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[28]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[29]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[30]  B. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[31]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[32]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .