INTEGRATED LAND USE-TRANSPORT MODELS

Abstract This paper is a review of computer models of the interrelationships between land use and transport, particularly of the long‐term effects of changes in transport costs on cities and the consequent effects on travel demand. The nature of this relationship is examined in terms of empirical evidence, and a set of criteria against which the models can be evaluated is defined. Four major types of model are examined: regression, mathematical programming, aggregate spatial interaction and individual choice. Each type is considered in terms of operational examples and the strengths and weaknesses of each approach are identified. However, it is recognized that few of the models are capable of representing the major social and technological changes that are currently influencing urban development, and that this is where emphasis should be put if this type of model is to be useful for policy‐making in the future.

[1]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Evidence of land use impacts of rapid transit systems , 1977 .

[2]  V. Kreibich,et al.  The successful transportation system and the regional planning problem: An evaluation of the Munich rapid transit system in the context of urban and regional planning policy , 1978 .

[3]  Roger Mackett,et al.  The inter-relationships between travel and locational decisions , 1983 .

[4]  T. Rhodes.  Computer models in sub-regional planning , 1969 .

[5]  A. Anas.  Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models , 1983 .

[6]  Roger Mackett,et al.  LEEDS INTEGRATED LAND-USE TRANSPORT MODEL (LILT) , 1983 .

[7]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[8]  Benjamin H. Stevens,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY IN URBAN AREAS. , 1960 .

[9]  S. H. Putman.  DEVELOPING AND TESTING AN INTRA-REGIONAL MODEL , 1970 .

[10]  M. Wegener.  Modeling Urban Decline: A Multilevel Economic-Demographic Model for the Dortmund Region , 1982, International regional science review.

[11]  The Evaluation of an Empiric Model for an Urban Area , 1974 .

[12]  Rl Mackett,et al.  RESIDENTIAL SEARCH BEHAVIOR - THE IMPLICATIONS FOR SURVEY AND ANALYTICAL DESIGN , 1985 .

[13]  C. L. Mallows,et al.  Individual Choice Behaviour. , 1961 .

[14]  Roger Mackett.  Forecasting the Long Term Effects of Increases in the Cost of Travel , 1985 .

[15]  Peter H. Rossi,et al.  Why Families Move , 1956 .

[16]  R. L. Knight.  The impact of rail transit on land use: Evidence and a change of perspective , 1980 .

[17]  W. Steger.  THE PITTSBURGH URBAN RENEWAL SIMULATION MODEL , 1965 .

[18]  J W Dickey,et al.  TRANSPORTATION AND URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS , 1974 .

[19]  David Foot,et al.  A land-use model for sub-regional planning , 1969 .

[20]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[21]  Anthony Richardson,et al.  SEARCH MODELS AND CHOICE SET GENERATION , 1980 .

[22]  Marcial Echenique.  The Sao Paulo Metropolitan Study: A Case Study of the Effectiveness of Urban Systems Analysis , 1983 .

[23]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[24]  Donald M. Hill,et al.  A GROWTH ALLOCATION MODEL FOR THE EOSTON REGION , 1965 .

[25]  Roger Mackett.  THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORT POLICY ON THE CITY , 1984 .

[26]  I. S. Lowry.  A model of metropolis , 1964 .

[27]  Robert J. Meyer,et al.  THEORY OF DESTINATION CHOICE-SET FORMATION UNDER INFORMATIONAL CONSTRAINT , 1980 .

[28]  H. Garnett.  The Tehran land use transportation planning model and policy evaluation procedure , 1980 .

[29]  R. Mackett,et al.  Land Use-Transport Interactions , 1985 .

[30]  Michael A. Stegman.  Accessibility models and residential location , 1969 .

[31]  Alan Wilson,et al.  A statistical theory of spatial distribution models , 1967 .

[32]  Janet Rothenberg Pack,et al.  The Use of Urban Models: Report on a Survey of Planning Organizations , 1975 .

[33]  J. A. C. C. Watson-Gandy.  A disaggregate travel demand model , 1975 .

[34]  J. Mcloughlin.  Urban and regional planning: A systems approach , 1969 .

[35]  William Goldner,et al.  The Lowry Model Heritage , 1971 .

[36]  Michael Batty,et al.  ACTIVITY ALLOCATION MODEL FOR NOTTINGHAMSHIRE-DERBYSHIRE SUBREGION , 1970 .

[37]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Geographic Transfer of Travel Choice Models: Evaluation and Procedures , 1985 .

[38]  Michael Wegener,et al.  The Dortmund Housing Market Model: A Monte Carlo Simulation of a Regional Housing Market , 1985 .

[39]  Alan Wilson,et al.  SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ENTROPY MAXIMIZING MODELS, MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING MODELS, AND THEIR DUALS* , 1974 .

[40]  Michael Batty,et al.  Optimization and Discrete Choice in Urban Systems , 1985 .

[41]  Steven R. Lerman.  Random Utility Models of Spatial Choice , 1985 .

[42]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Modeling individual residential preferences: A totally disaggregate approach , 1979 .

[43]  Marc Los,et al.  Combined Residential-Location and Transportation Models , 1979 .

[44]  H. J. Brown,et al.  Changes in Workplace and Residential Locations , 2020, Social Structure and Social Mobility.

[45]  M. Echenique,et al.  A spatial model of urban stock and activity , 1969 .

[46]  E. L. Cripps,et al.  The Urbanisation Effects of a Third London Airport , 1970 .

[47]  Michael Batty,et al.  Models and Projections of the Space Economy. A sub-regional study in north west England , 1970 .

[48]  Steven R Lerman,et al.  LOCATION, HOUSING, AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP, AND MODE TO WORK: A JOINT CHOICE MODEL , 1976 .

[49]  John W. Dickey,et al.  TOPAZ: General planning technique and its applications at the regional, urban, and facility planning levels , 1980 .