Modelling Compaction from On-line Measurement of Soil Properties and Sensor Draught

The finite element method was used to analyse the cutting process of a sandy loam soil with medium-deep subsoiler, used as a compaction sensor, aiming to calculate the subsoiler draught for various combinations of dry bulk density, moisture content and tillage depth. The finite element results showed that draught increased with depth and dry bulk density, whereas it decreased with moisture content. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to establish a formula for relating subsoiler draught (dependent variable) with the three independent variables. The regression equation developed was simple and had a high determination coefficient close to 0.95. An equation for prediction of dry bulk density as a function of moisture content, depth and draught was derived from the regression equation developed. This equation was used to calculate dry bulk density, for measured depth, moisture content and draught at nine different points along a single line in a meadow field of a silty clay loam soil. The predicted dry bulk density indicated that there was a considerable variation in the degree of compaction throughout the measured line. However, the on-line depth control and measurement of moisture content still need to be integrated with the on-line measurement of draught, to govern the model suitability for performing on-line detection of the spatial distribution of soil compaction, assessed as dry bulk density.

[1]  K. J. Shinners,et al.  Combining active and passive tillage elements to reduce draft requirements. , 1990 .

[2]  Abdul Mounem Mouazen,et al.  Tillage tool design by the finite element method : Part 2. Experimental validation of the finite element results with soil bin test , 1999 .

[3]  Raymond N. Yong,et al.  Finite element analysis of plane soil cutting , 1977 .

[4]  G. E. Miles,et al.  Energy Requirement for Subsoiling Coastal Plain Soils , 1987 .

[5]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Comparison of tillage forces and wear rates of pressed and cast cultivator shares , 1993 .

[6]  D. C. Erbach,et al.  Tilth index: an approach to quantifying soil tilth. , 1992 .

[7]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Dynamic Sensing of Soil Pans , 1988 .

[8]  J. Stafford,et al.  Soil strength variability within fields. , 1999 .

[9]  H. Ramon,et al.  SW—Soil and Water: Effects of Bulk Density and Moisture Content on Selected Mechanical Properties of Sandy Loam Soil , 2002 .

[10]  Abdul Mounem Mouazen,et al.  Finite element analysis of subsoiler cutting in non-homogeneous sandy loam soil , 1999 .

[11]  T. H. Garner,et al.  Energy for Conservation Tillage in Coastal Plain Soils , 1988 .

[12]  Richard J. Godwin,et al.  AN EXTENDED OCTAGONAL RING TRANSDUCER FOR USE IN TILLAGE STUDIES , 1975 .

[13]  Abdul Mounem Mouazen,et al.  Tillage Tool Design by the Finite Element Method: Part 1. Finite Element Modelling of Soil Plastic Behaviour , 1999 .

[14]  D. Gee-Clough,et al.  Deformation and Failure in Wet Clay Soil: Part 3, Finite Element Analysis of Cutting of Wet Clay by Tines , 1994 .

[15]  R. L. Kushwaha,et al.  A non-linear 3-D finite element analysis of soil failure with tillage tools , 1990 .

[16]  R. L. Kushwaha,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Dynamic Interaction Between Soil and Tillage Tool , 1995 .

[17]  T. Hassard,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005 .

[18]  J. van Bergeijk,et al.  Soil Tillage Resistance as Tool to Map Soil Type Differences , 1996 .