Why Visual Management?

From early on, visual management (VM) has been an intrinsic ingredient of the Toyota Production System (TPS) and its derivatives like lean production. Akin to the evolution of most other parts of the TPS, it has been developed through practitioner efforts rather than being propelled by theoretical insights. Recently, scholars have started to create a theoretical knowledge base for VM. Besides taxonomies of visual devices and their functions, there is only one fully fledged theory of VM, based on the concept of affordance. It is contended here that the scholarly field of visual management has been too narrowly defined. In fact, research on (or bearing on) visual devices has been carried out in several other, mostly small fields, often with little mutual awareness. A review on the theoretical explanation of VM is provided, based on this wider literature. The concept of affordance has been used in this context already in early 1990s. This focuses attention especially to the human cognitive capabilities and corresponding features of visual devices. Generally, VM is argued to provide a more rapid and reliable mode of communication in comparison to traditional alternatives. VM is thus compatible with the lean tenets of time compression and variability reduction. This explains its central role in lean production.

[1]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  The use of visual information in natural scenes , 2005 .

[3]  Lisa R. Goldberg,et al.  Thinking, Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman , 2013 .

[4]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Where Rhetoric and Lean Meet , 2015 .

[5]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  An experimental study of computer mediated collaborative design , 1996, Proceedings of WET ICE '96. IEEE 5th Workshop on Enabling Technologies; Infrastucture for Collaborative Enterprises.

[7]  Sami Paavola,et al.  Reconceptualizing object construction: the dynamics of Building Information Modelling in construction design , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Zeeshan Aziz,et al.  From conventional to IT based visual management: a conceptual discussion for lean construction , 2017, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[9]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The Cognitive Design of Tools of Thought , 2014, Review of Philosophy and Psychology.

[10]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using Visual Information for Grounding and Awareness in Collaborative Tasks , 2012, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  E. Bell,et al.  Visual Management Studies: Empirical and Theoretical Approaches , 2013 .

[12]  Carlos Torres Formoso,et al.  Guidelines for Devising and Assessing Visual Management Systems in Construction Sites , 2017 .

[13]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visualization in management: From communication to collaboration. A response to Zhang , 2013, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[14]  Bruno Campelo Medeiros.  Life Cycle Canvas (LCC): análise de um modelo de gestão visual para o planejamento de projetos , 2017 .

[15]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity , 2005 .

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence , 2002, CSCW '02.

[17]  A. Zachary Hettinger,et al.  Cognitive engineering and health informatics: Applications and intersections , 2017, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[18]  L. Koskela.  Why is management research irrelevant? , 2017 .

[19]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Towards Shared Understanding on Common Ground, Boundary Objects and Other Related Concepts , 2016 .

[20]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control , 1999, TCHI.

[21]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Visual management in production management : a literature synthesis , 2016 .

[22]  Mark W Wiggins,et al.  Cognitive engineering. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[23]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Making sense of visual management through affordance theory , 2017 .

[24]  Russell E. Jackson,et al.  Evolutionary Relevance Facilitates Visual Information Processing , 2013, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[25]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[26]  N. Landi.  An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults , 2010, Reading and writing.

[27]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[28]  S. P. Springer,et al.  Left brain, right brain , 1981 .

[29]  Philip N Johnson-Laird,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Mental models and human reasoning , 2010 .

[30]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Visualizing Thought , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Observations of teamwork and social processes in design , 1995 .