Tehran’s seismic vulnerability classification using granular computing approach

Tehran, capital of Iran, is located on a number of known and unknown faults which make this mega city exposed to huge earthquakes. Determining locations and intensity of seismic vulnerability of a city is considered as a complicated disaster management problem. As this problem generally depends on various criteria, one of the most important challenges concerned is the existence of uncertainty regarding inconsistency in combining those effective criteria. The emergence of uncertainty in seismic vulnerability map results to some biases in risk management which has multilateral effects in dealing with the consequences of the earthquake. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes a new approach for Tehran’s seismic vulnerability classification based on granular computing. One of the most significant properties of this method is inference of accurate rules having zero entropy from predefined classification undertaken based on training datasets by the expert. Furthermore, not-redundant covering rules will be extracted for consistent classification where one object maybe classified with two or more nonredundant rules. In this paper, Tehran statistical zones (3,173 according to 1996 census) are considered as the study area. Since this city has not experienced a disastrous earthquake since 1830, this work’s results is the relative accurate with respect to the results of previous studies.

[1]  Behzad Moshiri,et al.  THE EVIDENTIAL REASONING APPROACH FOR A MULTI ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING METHOD IN GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION , 2009 .

[2]  Robert S. Yeats,et al.  Contribution of archaeological data to studies of earthquake history in the Iranian Plateau , 2001 .

[3]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  ICS: An Interactive Classification System , 2007, Canadian Conference on AI.

[4]  Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data , 1991 .

[5]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[6]  Yi Pan,et al.  Clustering support vector machines for protein local structure prediction , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Pierre-Yves Bard,et al.  Site characterizations for the Iranian strong motion network , 1999 .

[8]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Incomplete Information: Rough Set Analysis , 1997 .

[9]  L. Zadeh,et al.  Data mining, rough sets and granular computing , 2002 .

[10]  M. Berberian,et al.  Patterns of historical earthquake rupture in the Iranian Plateau , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[13]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Granular Computing: basic issues and possible solutions , 2007 .

[14]  M. Jafari,et al.  Ground motion studies for microzonation in Iran , 2011 .

[15]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Some reflections on soft computing, granular computing and their roles in the conception, design and utilization of information/intelligent systems , 1998, Soft Comput..

[16]  R. Wille Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems , 1992 .

[17]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  A Partition Model of Granular Computing , 2004, Trans. Rough Sets.

[18]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Potential Applications of Granular Computing in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2008 .

[19]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  A Granular Computing Approach to Machine Learning , 2002, FSKD.

[20]  John R. Anderson,et al.  MACHINE LEARNING An Artificial Intelligence Approach , 2009 .

[21]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Induction of Classification Rules by Granular Computing , 2002, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[22]  Jean-Gabriel Ganascia TDIS : an Algebraic Formalization , 1993, IJCAI.

[23]  Stéphane Demri,et al.  Logical Analysis of Indiscernibility , 1998 .

[24]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Learning Efficient Classification Procedures and Their Application to Chess End Games , 1983 .