Initial in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a self‐monitoring prosthetic bypass graft

Objective: Prosthetic grafts used for lower extremity revascularization and dialysis access fail because of hyperplastic stenosis and thrombosis. Graft surveillance is advocated to monitor function; however, graft failure can occur between episodic examinations. An innovative sensor with wireless, microchip technology allows automated surveillance with assessment of graft function using a “cloud”‐based algorithm. We performed proof‐of‐concept experiments with in vitro and in vivo models to assess the feasibility such a real‐time graft surveillance system. Methods: A self‐monitoring graft system was evaluated consisting of a prosthetic conduit of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and a sensor unit, and a microsensor, microelectronics, battery, and remote processor with a monitor. The sensor unit was integrated on the extraluminal surface of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts without compromise to the lumen of the conduit. The grafts were tested in vitro in a pulsatile, recirculating flow system under physiologic flow parameters. The hemodynamic parameters were varied to assess the ability to obtain wireless signal acquisition reflecting real‐time flow properties in vitro. Segments of custom tubing with reduced diameters were inserted into the model to mimic stenosis proximal and distal to the grafts. After characterization of the initial data, the self‐monitoring grafts were implanted in an ovine carotid model to assess proof of concept in vivo with 30‐day follow‐up of signal acquisition as well as arteriographic and histologic analysis. Results: In vitro flow data demonstrated the device was able to determine factors related to prosthetic graft function under varied hemodynamic flow conditions. Wireless signal acquisition using Bluetooth technology (Bluetooth SIG, Inc, Kirkland, Wash) allowed remote data analysis reflecting graft flow parameters through changes in microsensor voltage and frequency. Waveform analysis was applied to construct an algorithm using proprietary software and determine a parameter for graft flow characteristics. This algorithm allowed determination of the degree of stenosis and location of stenosis location (proximal or distal) for display on a remote monitor in real time. Subsequent in vivo experiments confirmed the ability of the system to generate signal acquisition through skin and soft tissue under biologic conditions with no arteriographic stenosis and a favorable healing response at 30‐day harvest. Conclusions: Initial in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrate the ability for a self‐monitoring graft system to remotely monitor hemodynamic parameters reflecting graft function using wireless data transmission. This automated system shows promise to deliver real‐time data that can be analyzed by cloud‐based algorithms alerting the clinician of a change in graft function or development of stenosis for further diagnostic study or intervention before graft failure. Clinical Relevance: This report describes initial experiments with a graft‐sensor system that has the capability to provide remote, real‐time assessment of graft function. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant, wireless transmission through soft tissue using Bluetooth technology (Bluetooth SIG, Inc, Kirkland, Wash) with proprietary software allows active monitoring of function for bypass and dialysis access grafts. Detection of any alteration in flow or a “failing graft” would provide the opportunity to assess graft function with accepted imaging methods and intervene before graft thrombosis to preserve function with decreased morbidity and mortality to patients.

[1]  F. Veith,et al.  Use of a piezoelectric film sensor for monitoring vascular grafts. , 1990, American journal of surgery.

[2]  M Hassan Murad,et al.  Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities: management of asymptomatic disease and claudication. , 2015, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  F. Veith,et al.  Is surveillance to detect failing polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses worthwhile?: Twelve-year experience with ninety-one grafts. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  G. Seabrook,et al.  Monitoring functional patency of in situ saphenous vein bypasses: the impact of a surveillance protocol and elective revision. , 1989, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  R. Lees,et al.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis by phonoangiography. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  G. L. Engel,et al.  Duplex scan surveillance during the first year after infrainguinal autologous vein bypass grafting surgery: costs and clinical outcomes compared with other surveillance programs. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  J. Mckinsey,et al.  Correction: Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities: Management of asymptomatic disease and claudication (Journal of Vascular Surgery (2015) 61(3S) (2S-41S)) , 2015 .

[8]  R. Lees,et al.  Correlation of spectral phonoangiography and carotid angiography with gross pathology in carotid stenosis. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  F. Veith,et al.  A ten-year experience with one hundred fifty failing or threatened vein and polytetrafluoroethylene arterial bypass grafts. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  G. Moneta,et al.  Factors associated with primary vein graft occlusion in a multicenter trial with mandated ultrasound surveillance. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  D. Dawson,et al.  The correlation of early flow disturbances with the development of infrainguinal graft stenosis: a 10-year study of 341 autogenous vein grafts. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  J. Mills,et al.  The natural history of intermediate and critical vein graft stenosis: recommendations for continued surveillance or repair. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  John V. White,et al.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[14]  F. Veith,et al.  Diagnosis and management of failing lower extremity arterial reconstructions prior to graft occlusion. , 1984, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  Gerhard M. Sessler,et al.  Piezoelectricity in polyvinylidenefluoride , 1981 .

[16]  B. Lindblad,et al.  Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: a prospective randomized study. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[17]  R. Neville,et al.  From the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery A comparison of tibial artery bypass performed with heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and great saphenous vein to treat critical limb ischemia , 2012 .

[18]  W. T. Davies,et al.  Measurement of volume flow in the human common femoral artery using a duplex ultrasound system. , 1986, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  W. Henderson,et al.  Factors associated with early failure of infrainguinal lower extremity arterial bypass. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  R. Lees,et al.  Phonoangiography: a new noninvasive diagnostic method for studying arterial disease. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.