Structure and Topology Prediction of Phage Adhesion Devices Using AlphaFold2: The Case of Two Oenococcus oeni Phages

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important microorganisms in food fermentation. In the food industry, bacteriophages (phages or bacterial viruses) may cause the disruption of LAB-dependent processes with product inconsistencies and economic losses. LAB phages use diverse adhesion devices to infect their host, yet the overall picture of host-binding mechanisms remains incomplete. Here, we aimed to determine the structure and topology of the adhesion devices of two lytic siphophages, OE33PA and Vinitor162, infecting the wine bacteria Oenococcus oeni. These phages possess adhesion devices with a distinct composition and morphology and likely use different infection mechanisms. We primarily used AlphaFold2, an algorithm that can predict protein structure with unprecedented accuracy, to obtain a 3D model of the adhesion devices’ components. Using our prior knowledge of the architecture of the LAB phage host-binding machineries, we also reconstituted the topology of OE33PA and Vinitor162 adhesion devices. While OE33PA exhibits original structures in the assembly of its bulky adhesion device, Vinitor162 harbors several carbohydrate-binding modules throughout its long and extended adhesion device. Overall, these results highlight the ability of AlphaFold2 to predict protein structures and illustrate its great potential in the study of phage structures and host-binding mechanisms.

[1]  S. Ovchinnikov,et al.  ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all , 2022, Nature Methods.

[2]  K. Kavukcuoglu,et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome , 2021, Nature.

[3]  Oriol Vinyals,et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.

[4]  A. Lupas,et al.  High‐accuracy protein structure prediction in CASP14 , 2021, Proteins.

[5]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Characterization of the First Virulent Phage Infecting Oenococcus oeni, the Queen of the Cellars , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[6]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Wine Phenolic Compounds Differently Affect the Host-Killing Activity of Two Lytic Bacteriophages Infecting the Lactic Acid Bacterium Oenococcus oeni , 2020, Viruses.

[7]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers , 2020, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  G. Schoehn,et al.  Structure, function and assembly of the long, flexible tail of siphophages. , 2020, Current opinion in virology.

[9]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Structural Insights into Lactococcal Siphophage p2 Baseplate Activation Mechanism , 2020, Viruses.

[10]  D. Hrebík,et al.  Structure and mechanism of DNA delivery of a gene transfer agent , 2020, Nature Communications.

[11]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Revisiting the host adhesion determinants of Streptococcus thermophilus siphophages , 2020, Microbial biotechnology.

[12]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Conserved and Diverse Traits of Adhesion Devices from Siphoviridae Recognizing Proteinaceous or Saccharidic Receptors , 2020, Viruses.

[13]  David T. Jones,et al.  Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning , 2020, Nature.

[14]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Reprogramming Bacteriophage Host Range through Structure-Guided Design of Chimeric Receptor Binding Proteins. , 2019, Cell reports.

[15]  T. Dokland,et al.  Structure of the host cell recognition and penetration machinery of a Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophage , 2019, bioRxiv.

[16]  P. Leiman,et al.  Structure and Function of the Branched Receptor-Binding Complex of Bacteriophage CBA120. , 2019, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  R. Vincentelli,et al.  Ubiquitous Carbohydrate Binding Modules Decorate 936 Lactococcal Siphophage Virions , 2019, Viruses.

[18]  R. Vincentelli,et al.  Functional carbohydrate binding modules identified in evolved dits from siphophages infecting various Gram‐positive bacteria , 2018, Molecular microbiology.

[19]  Mario Hupfeld,et al.  Molecular Basis of Bacterial Host Interactions by Gram-Positive Targeting Bacteriophages , 2018, Viruses.

[20]  Lukas Zimmermann,et al.  A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  G. Schoehn,et al.  Bacteriophage T5 tail tube structure suggests a trigger mechanism for Siphoviridae DNA ejection , 2017, Nature Communications.

[22]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Evolved distal tail carbohydrate binding modules of Lactobacillus phage J‐1: a novel type of anti‐receptor widespread among lactic acid bacteria phages , 2017, Molecular microbiology.

[23]  H. Neve,et al.  Genetic and functional characterisation of the lactococcal P335 phage-host interactions , 2017, BMC Genomics.

[24]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Structure of the host-recognition device of Staphylococcus aureus phage ϕ11 , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  A. Desmyter,et al.  The Atomic Structure of the Phage Tuc2009 Baseplate Tripod Suggests that Host Recognition Involves Two Different Carbohydrate Binding Modules , 2016, mBio.

[26]  J. Otero,et al.  Structure of the Receptor-Binding Carboxy-Terminal Domain of the Bacteriophage T5 L-Shaped Tail Fibre with and without Its Intra-Molecular Chaperone , 2015, Viruses.

[27]  C. Cambillau,et al.  The targeted recognition of Lactococcus lactis phages to their polysaccharide receptors , 2015, Molecular microbiology.

[28]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Cryo-Electron Microscopy Structure of Lactococcal Siphophage 1358 Virion , 2014, Journal of Virology.

[29]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Molecular Insights on the Recognition of a Lactococcus lactis Cell Wall Pellicle by the Phage 1358 Receptor Binding Protein , 2014, Journal of Virology.

[30]  Pedro M. Coutinho,et al.  The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013 , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  E. Girard,et al.  Crystal Structure of pb9, the Distal Tail Protein of Bacteriophage T5: a Conserved Structural Motif among All Siphophages , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[32]  M. van Heel,et al.  Structure, Adsorption to Host, and Infection Mechanism of Virulent Lactococcal Phage p2 , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[33]  D. Veesler,et al.  Structure of the phage TP901-1 1.8 MDa baseplate suggests an alternative host adhesion mechanism , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  D. Veesler,et al.  Crystal Structure of Bacteriophage SPP1 Distal Tail Protein (gp19.1) , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  G. Sciara,et al.  Structure of lactococcal phage p2 baseplate and its mechanism of activation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[37]  Brandi L. Cantarel,et al.  The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Receptor-Binding Protein Head Domain from Lactococcus lactis Phage bIL170 , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[39]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  Fumio Arisaka,et al.  Structure of the cell-puncturing device of bacteriophage T4 , 2002, Nature.

[41]  Liisa Holm,et al.  Using Dali for Protein Structure Comparison. , 2020, Methods in molecular biology.