Manifestations of everyday design: guiding goals and motivations

This paper explores the relationship between goals, materials and competences in the practice of everyday design. Appropriations and creative uses of design artifacts are often reported in terms of outcomes and goals; however, we observe a gap in understanding how materials, tools, and competences are also involved in these processes. We conduct a multiple case study of three groups of everyday designers: families, hobbyist jewelers, and steampunk enthusiasts. We provide a description of the aspects of meaning, materials, and competences, as well as how they are interrelated, for each case. Our findings show that amongst these three aspects of the practice of everyday designers, it is the meaning of the practice that acts as the strongest motivator for practitioners. Materials, tools, and competences are hence largely determined accordingly. The implications of this study propose ways to design for practices with different types of meaning: foundational, aesthetic, and aspirational goals.

[1]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Second-hand interactions: investigating reacquisition and dispossession practices around domestic objects , 2011, CHI.

[2]  Amy Spencer,et al.  DIY: The Rise of Lo-Fi Culture , 2005 .

[3]  Eric Paulos You amateur! , 2012, INTR.

[4]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Domestic Routines and Design for the Home , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[5]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[7]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[8]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Designing for appropriation , 2007, BCS HCI.

[9]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  The resourcefulness of everyday design , 2007, C&C '07.

[10]  DourishPaul The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies , 2003 .

[11]  Jonathan Bean,et al.  Learning from IKEA hacking: i'm not one to decoupage a tabletop and call it a day. , 2009, CHI.

[12]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Steampunk as design fiction , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  The dynamics of social practice , 2011 .

[14]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[15]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  A sustainable identity: the creativity of an everyday designer , 2009, CHI.

[16]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Aspects of Everyday Design: Resourcefulness, Adaptation, and Emergence , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Artful systems in the home , 2005, CHI.

[18]  Alain Karsenty,et al.  Unremarkable computing , 2002, CHI.

[19]  Elizabeth Goodman,et al.  From garments to gardens: negotiating material relationships online and 'by hand' , 2011, CHI.

[20]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[21]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  What drives customization?: control or identity? , 2011, CHI.

[22]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).