A review of factors that affect contact angle and implications for flotation practice.

Contact angle and the wetting behaviour of solid particles are influenced by many physical and chemical factors such as surface roughness and heterogeneity as well as particle shape and size. A significant amount of effort has been invested in order to probe the correlation between these factors and surface wettability. Some of the key investigations reported in the literature are reviewed here. It is clear from the papers reviewed that, depending on many experimental conditions such as the size of the surface heterogeneities and asperities, surface cleanliness, and the resolution of measuring equipment and data interpretation, obtaining meaningful contact angle values is extremely difficult and such values are reliant on careful experimental control. Surface wetting behaviour depends on not only surface texture (roughness and particle shape), and surface chemistry (heterogeneity) but also on hydrodynamic conditions in the preparation route. The inability to distinguish the effects of each factor may be due to the interplay and/or overlap of two or more factors in each system. From this review, it was concluded that: Surface geometry (and surface roughness of different scales) can be used to tune the contact angle; with increasing surface roughness the apparent contact angle decreases for hydrophilic materials and increases for hydrophobic materials. For non-ideal surfaces, such as mineral surfaces in the flotation process, kinetics plays a more important role than thermodynamics in dictating wettability. Particle size encountered in flotation (10-200 microm) showed no significant effect on contact angle but has a strong effect on flotation rate constant. There is a lack of a rigid quantitative correlation between factors affecting wetting, wetting behaviour and contact angle on minerals; and hence their implication for flotation process. Specifically, universal correlation of contact angle to flotation recovery is still difficult to predict from first principles. Other advanced techniques and measures complementary to contact angle will be essential to establish the link between research and practice in flotation.

[1]  E. E. Miller,et al.  Capillary flow phenomena and wettability in porous media: II. Dynamic flow studies , 1988 .

[2]  T. Subrahmanyam,et al.  Contact angles of quartz by capillary penetration of liquids and captive bubble techniques , 1999 .

[3]  C. Prestidge,et al.  Contact angle and surface analysis studies of sphalerite particles , 1996 .

[4]  A. Neumann,et al.  The shapes of liquid menisci near heterogeneous walls and the effect of line tension on contact angle hysteresis , 1994 .

[5]  C. Prestidge,et al.  Contact angle studies of particulate sulphide minerals , 1996 .

[6]  D. Kwok,et al.  Measuring and interpreting contact angles: a complex issue , 1998 .

[7]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  A study of bubble–particle interaction using atomic force microscopy , 2003 .

[8]  J. Schultz,et al.  Effect of dynamic contact angle on capillary rise phenomena , 2000 .

[9]  Henk J. Busscher,et al.  The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids , 1984 .

[10]  Extrand,et al.  An Experimental Study of Contact Angle Hysteresis , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[11]  Pradip,et al.  Zeta potentials in the flotation of oxide and silicate minerals. , 2005, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[12]  Anh V. Nguyen,et al.  Critical thickness of microscopic thin liquid films. , 2005, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[13]  K. Prabhu,et al.  Review of non-reactive and reactive wetting of liquids on surfaces. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[14]  P. J. Hill Statistics of Multiple Particle Breakage Accounting for Particle Shape , 2004 .

[15]  R. Crawford,et al.  Contact angles on particles and plates , 1987 .

[16]  G. Jameson,et al.  Dewetting kinetics on silica substrates - three-phase contact expansion measurements for aqueous dodecylammonium chloride films , 2006 .

[17]  O. Ozdemir,et al.  Water structure and its influence on the flotation of carbonate and bicarbonate salts. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[18]  Anh V. Nguyen,et al.  Effects of surfactant adsorption and surface forces on thinning and rupture of foam liquid films , 2005 .

[19]  N. Churaev On the forces of hydrophobic attraction in wetting films of aqueous solutions , 1993 .

[20]  H. Schulze Dimensionless number and approximate calculation of the upper particle size of floatability in flotation machines , 1982 .

[21]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[22]  R. H. Dettre,et al.  Contact Angle Hysteresis: I. Study of an Idealized Rough Surface , 1964 .

[23]  Graeme J. Jameson,et al.  The flotation of fine and coarse particles , 2007 .

[24]  I. Sutherland,et al.  Effects of the chromic acid etching on propylene polymer surfaces , 1995 .

[25]  S. Basu,et al.  Mechanisms for contact angle hysteresis and advancing contact angles , 1999 .

[26]  Yi Y. Zuo,et al.  Applied Surface Thermodynamics , 2010 .

[27]  P. Friedel,et al.  Contact angle measurements with liquids consisting of bulky molecules. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[28]  Ugur Ulusoy,et al.  Influence of shape characteristics of talc mineral on the column flotation behavior , 2006 .

[29]  A. Adamson Physical chemistry of surfaces , 1960 .

[30]  Stefan Zürcher,et al.  Beyond the lotus effect: roughness influences on wetting over a wide surface-energy range. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[31]  N. Churaev,et al.  Prediction of contact angles on the basis of the Frumkin-Derjaguin approach , 1995 .

[32]  B. K. Parekh,et al.  Advances in flotation technology , 1999 .

[33]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[34]  D. Pease The Significance of the Contact Angle in Relation to the Solid Surface , 1945 .

[35]  Alidad Amirfazli,et al.  Factors affecting the measurement of roughness factor of surfaces and its implications for wetting studies , 2008 .

[36]  Anh V. Nguyen,et al.  Colloidal Science of Flotation , 2003 .

[37]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation , 1999 .

[38]  H. Schulze,et al.  Probability of particle attachment on gas bubbles by sliding , 1992 .

[39]  C. Extrand,et al.  Criteria for ultralyophobic surfaces. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[40]  G. Kretzschmar Dynamics of Adsorption at Liquid Interfaces , 1995 .

[41]  P. Gennes Wetting: statics and dynamics , 1985 .

[42]  Jaroslaw Drelich,et al.  The effect of drop (bubble) size on advancing and receding contact angles for heterogeneous and rough solid surfaces as observed with sessile-drop and captive-bubble techniques , 1996 .

[43]  J. Ralston,et al.  Wetting dynamics studies on silica surfaces of varied hydrophobicity , 1992 .

[44]  T. T. Chau A review of techniques for measurement of contact angles and their applicability on mineral surfaces , 2009 .

[45]  Eugene A. Irene,et al.  Area evaluation of microscopically rough surfaces , 1999 .

[46]  T. J. McCarthy,et al.  How Wenzel and cassie were wrong. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[47]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Bubble particle heterocoagulation under turbulent conditions. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[48]  C. Radke,et al.  Wetting and Spreading Dynamics , 2019 .

[49]  M. Hampton,et al.  Anomalous time effect on particle-bubble interactions studied by atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[50]  Anh V. Nguyen,et al.  Time of gas–solid–liquid three-phase contact expansion in flotation , 1999 .

[51]  B. Toshev Thermodynamic theory of thin liquid films including line tension effects , 2008 .

[52]  Tomohiro Onda,et al.  Super Water-Repellent Surfaces Resulting from Fractal Structure , 1996 .

[53]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  The effect of surface heterogeneity on pseudo-line tension and the flotation limit of fine particles , 1992 .

[54]  S. G. Mason,et al.  An experimental study of some effects of solid surface roughness on wetting , 1980 .

[55]  B. Widom Structure and tension of interfaces , 1999 .

[56]  Anh V. Nguyen New method and equations for determining attachment tenacity and particle size limit in flotation , 2003 .

[57]  H. Schulze,et al.  New theoretical and experimental investigations on stability of bubble/particle aggregates in flotation: A theory on the upper particle size of floatability , 1977 .

[58]  Walliser,et al.  Capillary Rise for Thermodynamic Characterization of Solid Particle Surface , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[59]  John Ralston,et al.  The influence of particle size and contact angle in mineral flotation , 1988 .

[60]  A. Neumann,et al.  Study of the advancing and receding contact angles: liquid sorption as a cause of contact angle hysteresis. , 2002, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[61]  D. Möbius,et al.  Drops and bubbles in interfacial research , 1998 .

[62]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Status of the three-phase line tension: a review. , 2004, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[63]  H. Schubert On the turbulence-controlled microprocesses in flotation machines , 1999 .

[64]  C. Extrand Contact Angles and Hysteresis on Surfaces with Chemically Heterogeneous Islands , 2003 .

[65]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Formation of monolayers by the coadsorption of thiols on gold: variation in the head group, tail group, and solvent , 1989 .

[66]  J. Liburdy,et al.  Theoretical model for the wetting of a rough surface. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[67]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Molecular features of the air/carbonate solution interface. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[68]  Ugur Ulusoy,et al.  Correlation of the surface roughness of some industrial minerals with their wettability parameters , 2005 .

[69]  M. Krasowska,et al.  Kinetics of bubble collision and attachment to hydrophobic solids: I. Effect of surface roughness , 2007 .

[70]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Aqueous film drainage at the quartz/water/air interface , 1993 .

[71]  R. Yoon,et al.  Induction time measurements for the quartz—amine flotation system , 1991 .

[72]  J. Ralston,et al.  Surface and Capillary Forces Affecting Air Bubble−Particle Interactions in Aqueous Electrolyte , 1996 .

[73]  E. Chibowski,et al.  Problems of contact angle and solid surface free energy determination. , 2002, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[74]  V. Sobolev,et al.  Wetting of low-energy surfaces. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[75]  F. E. Bartell,et al.  Surface Roughness as Related to Hysteresis of Contact Angles. II. The Systems Paraffin–3 Molar Calcium Chloride Solution–Air and Paraffin–Glycerol–Air , 2002 .

[76]  S. Dukhin,et al.  Physicochemical hydrodynamics of Rising Bubble , 1998 .

[77]  D. Bradshaw,et al.  Presence of negative charge on the basal planes of New York talc. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[78]  I. Saguy,et al.  Contact angle measurement on rough surfaces. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[79]  David Galipeau,et al.  Characterization of SiO2 surface treatments using AFM, contact angles and a novel dewpoint technique , 1999 .

[80]  R. Good,et al.  Thermodynamics of contact angles. I. Heterogeneous solid surfaces , 1972 .

[81]  Ugur Ulusoy,et al.  Role of shape properties of calcite and barite particles on apparent hydrophobicity , 2004 .

[82]  V Dutschk,et al.  Kinetics of wetting and spreading by aqueous surfactant solutions. , 2008, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[83]  W. Skinner,et al.  Inferring wettability of heterogeneous surfaces by ToF-SIMS. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[84]  Norman R. Morrow,et al.  The Effects of Surface Roughness On Contact: Angle With Special Reference to Petroleum Recovery , 1975 .

[85]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[86]  Jacob H. Masliyah,et al.  A novel experimental technique to study single bubble–bitumen attachment in flotation , 2004 .

[87]  Dongqing Li,et al.  THERMODYNAMIC STATUS OF CONTACT ANGLES , 1996 .

[88]  Goro Yamauchi,et al.  Hydrophobicity of ion-plated PTFE coatings , 1997 .

[89]  T. Young III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids , 1805, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[90]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Induction-time measurements at a particle bed , 1989 .