Cost-based optimization of the stopping threshold for local disease surveillance during progressive eradication of tuberculosis from New Zealand wildlife.

Bovine tuberculosis (TB) is managed in New Zealand largely via population reduction of the major wildlife disease reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis, the introduced brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula. New Zealand aims to eradicate M. bovis infection from its livestock and wildlife within 40 years, as the culmination of progressive regional eradication programmes. Declarations of regional eradication are decided after extensive possum population control and post-control surveillance; hence, we developed a modelling framework, based on eco-epidemiological simulation data, to provide cost-evaluated options for deciding when to make these declarations. A decision-support framework evaluated potential costs of wildlife surveillance (and recontrol, if required) with respect to the calculated probability of successful eradication of M. bovis from wildlife. This enabled expected costs to be predicted in terms of stopping thresholds, allowing selection of optimal stopping rules based on minimizing costs. We identified factors that could influence optimal stopping values applied during regional eradication. Where vector/disease surveillance was inexpensive (for example, using low-cost detection devices or sentinel wildlife hosts) optimization involved setting a higher rather than lower stopping value, as it would be cheaper to minimize the risk of making a false declaration of eradication than to remedy any such failure. In addition, any cost of recontrol would largely depend on the time to rediscovery of residual M. bovis infection in wildlife, which would in turn be linked to the level of ongoing passive surveillance (with more rapid detection of re-emergent infection among wildlife in farmland situations than in remote forested regions). These two scenarios would favour different optimal stopping rules, as would the consideration of stakeholder confidence and socio-political issues, which are discussed. The framework presented here provides guidance to assess the economics underlying eradication of bovine TB from New Zealand farming; this eliminates reliance upon a pre-determined and uniform stopping rule for ceasing active management.

[1]  G. Nugent,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Tuberculosis Management in Brushtail Possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), through Indirect Surveillance of Mycobacterium bovis Infection Using Released Sentinel Pigs , 2014, Veterinary medicine international.

[2]  G. Nugent,et al.  Development of the New Zealand strategy for local eradication of tuberculosis from wildlife and livestock , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[3]  Eli P. Fenichel,et al.  Wildlife Disease Bioeconomics , 2011 .

[4]  David S. L. Ramsey,et al.  Management of bovine tuberculosis in brushtail possums in New Zealand: predictions from a spatially explicit, individual‐based model , 2010 .

[5]  Peter W J Baxter,et al.  Optimal eradication: when to stop looking for an invasive plant. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[6]  Michael A. McCarthy,et al.  Using sighting records to declare eradication of an invasive species , 2009 .

[7]  G. Nugent,et al.  Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[8]  N. Barlow,et al.  A SPATIALLY AGGREGATED DISEASE/HOST MODEL FOR BOVINE Tb IN NEW ZEALAND POSSUM POPULATIONS , 1991 .

[9]  A. James Guide to epidemiological surveillance for rinderpest , 1998 .

[10]  C. Gortázar,et al.  The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis in wild deer and feral pigs and their roles in the establishment and spread of bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand wildlife , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[11]  G. Hickling,et al.  Effects of sustained control of brushtail possums on levels of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle and brushtail possum populations from Hohotaka, New Zealand. , 1999, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[12]  B. Warburton,et al.  Managing and eradicating wildlife tuberculosis in New Zealand , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[13]  G. Nugent,et al.  Epidemiology and control of Mycobacterium bovis infection in brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), the primary wildlife host of bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[14]  G. Nugent,et al.  USE OF RELEASED PIGS AS SENTINELS FOR MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS , 2002, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[15]  T. Selhorst,et al.  The elimination of fox rabies from Europe: determinants of success and lessons for the future , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  L. Corner The role of wild animal populations in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in domestic animals: how to assess the risk. , 2006, Veterinary microbiology.

[17]  G. Nugent,et al.  Development of integrated surveillance systems for the management of tuberculosis in New Zealand wildlife , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[18]  P. Rhode,et al.  An Impossible Undertaking: The Eradication of Bovine Tuberculosis in the United States , 2004, The Journal of Economic History.

[19]  N. Johnson,et al.  Current status of rabies and prospects for elimination , 2014, The Lancet.

[20]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Risk-sensitivity and the mean-variance trade-off: decision making in sensorimotor control , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  G. Nugent Maintenance, spillover and spillback transmission of bovine tuberculosis in multi-host wildlife complexes: a New Zealand case study. , 2011, Veterinary microbiology.

[22]  M. Rohan,et al.  Opposition to aerial 1080 poisoning for control of invasive mammals in New Zealand: risk perceptions and agency responses , 2012 .

[23]  B. Elkin,et al.  Wildlife reservoirs for bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in Canada: strategies for management and research. , 2006, Veterinary microbiology.

[24]  G. Nugent,et al.  Chew-track-cards: a multiple-species small mammal detection device , 2011 .

[25]  P. Klepac,et al.  Towards the endgame and beyond: complexities and challenges for the elimination of infectious diseases , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Jordan Petchenik,et al.  CWD After “the Fire”: Six Reasons Why Hunters Resisted Wisconsin's Eradication Effort , 2010 .

[27]  K. Campbell,et al.  Quantifying the success of feral cat eradication, San Nicolas Island, California. , 2011 .

[28]  J. Griffin,et al.  Epidemiology, diagnostics, and management of tuberculosis in domestic cattle and deer in New Zealand in the face of a wildlife reservoir , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[29]  K. Wickwire Mathematical models for the control of pests and infectious diseases: a survey. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[30]  A. Gormley,et al.  A novel approach to assess the probability of disease eradication from a wild-animal reservoir host , 2013, Epidemiology and Infection.

[31]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.