Intragenic Variation of Synonymous Substitution Rates Is Caused by Nonrandom Mutations at Methylated CpG

Abstract. It has been observed that synonymous substitution rates vary among genes in various organisms, although the cause of the variation is unresolved. At the intragenic level, however, the variation of synonymous substitutions is somewhat controversial. By developing a rigorous statistical test and applying the test to 418 homologous gene pairs between mouse and rat, we found that more than 90% of gene pairs showed a statistical significance in intragenic variation of synonymous substitution rates. Moreover, by examining all conceivable possibilities for the cause of the variation, we successfully found that intragenic variation of synonymous substitutions in mammalian genes is caused mainly by a nonrandom mutation due to the methylation of CpG dinucleotides rather than by functional constraints.

[1]  M. Zuker.  On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. , 1989, Science.

[2]  P. Simmonds,et al.  Characteristics of Nucleotide Substitution in the Hepatitis C Virus Genome: Constraints on Sequence Change in Coding Regions at Both Ends of the Genome , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[3]  J. Powell,et al.  Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  T. Jukes.  Non-Darwinian Evolution , 2001 .

[5]  M. Kimura.  Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level , 1968, Nature.

[6]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome , 1989, Nature.

[7]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  R Holliday,et al.  DNA methylation and mutation. , 1993, Mutation research.

[9]  F. Wright.  The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. , 1990, Gene.

[10]  A. Bird,et al.  Functions for DNA methylation in vertebrates. , 1993, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[11]  M. Nei,et al.  Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  H. Akashi.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. , 1994, Genetics.

[13]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Josep M. Comeron,et al.  An Evaluation of Measures of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[15]  P. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for 'rare' codons. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  M. Kreitman,et al.  The correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in Drosophila: mutation, selection or relaxed constraints? , 1998, Genetics.

[17]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[18]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  M. Nei,et al.  Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  C. Luo,et al.  A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  T. Gojobori,et al.  Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. , 1992, Genetics.

[23]  M. Aguadé,et al.  Synonymous substitutions in the Xdh gene of Drosophila: heterogeneous distribution along the coding region. , 1996, Genetics.

[24]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Substitutions in Mammalian Genes: Intragenic Correlations , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  R. Britten,et al.  Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. , 1986, Science.