Knowledge transfer in virtual information systems development teams: an empirical examination of key enablers

Knowledge transfer among geographically separated members is recognized as a critical ingredient for collaborative accomplishment of knowledge work in virtual teams. However, due to the "localness" of knowledge, such transfer of knowledge is believed to be inherently problematic, and thus, it is important to develop a solid understanding of the factors that enable knowledge transfer in such contexts. Drawing on existing literature on knowledge management and virtual teamwork, we identify 4 Cs (communication, capability, credibility, and culture) associated with individuals who are found to transfer significant amounts of knowledge to remote members, and test the 4 Cs in the context of US-Norwegian virtual teams engaged in systems development. A number of implications and directions for future research are also suggested.

[1]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[2]  Georg Disterer,et al.  Individual and social barriers to knowledge transfer , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  G. Lakomski.  Managing Organizational Knowledge , 2005 .

[4]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[5]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  A Socio-Technical View of Knowledge Sharing at Buckman Laboratories , 1998, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement , 1982 .

[7]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[8]  C. W. Lohuizen,et al.  Knowledge Management and Policymaking , 1986 .

[9]  Joey F. George,et al.  Modern Systems Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[10]  Y. B. Puccinelli.  Overcoming resistance to change: The success of your technology initiative depends on it , 1998 .

[11]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge Based Approach : , 1996 .

[12]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[13]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[14]  B. Puccinelli.  Strategies for sharing knowledge: To successfully implement a KM initiative, moving from individual to collaborative effort is essential , 1998 .

[15]  R. Perloff.  The dynamics of persuasion , 1993 .

[16]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions , 1999 .

[17]  Paul L. Walker,et al.  The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge , 1994 .

[18]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development , 2000, DATB.

[19]  Robert J. Hiebeler,et al.  Benchmarking: Knowledge management , 1996 .

[20]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[21]  Christine E. Earley.  Knowledge Acquisition in Auditing: Training Novice Auditors to Recognize Cue Relationships in Real Estate Valuation , 2001 .

[22]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[23]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[24]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[25]  R. Walton,et al.  The diffusion of new work structures: Explaining why success didn't take , 1975 .

[26]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context , 1996 .

[27]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? , 1979 .

[28]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[29]  G. Walsham.  Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[30]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[32]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[33]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[34]  Gabriel Szulanski.  The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[35]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  New media and organizing at the group level , 2002 .

[36]  Jeffrey Stamps,et al.  Virtual teams: The new way to work , 1999 .

[37]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Transfer of Marketing Know-How in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Role and Antecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity , 1999 .

[38]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .