Site Specific Optimization of Rotor/Generator Sizing of Wind Turbines

Economics, including all incentives, is the primary factor that drives the development of wind farms. Optimizing the wind turbine generator size-to-rotor size design based on an economic figure of merit shows that maximum wind turbine capacity factor does not yield the best economics for a given wind resource. A large rotor on a small generator will have a high capacity factor but a low annual output of electrical energy. For the same capital investment a different configuration would produce more electricity making the project more economically sound. This study varied rotor-to-generator size at a fixed capital cost and used a modified blade element momentum model to predict annual electrical energy production for each design at a given wind resource. Optimal design was the design that resulted in the highest annual electrical energy production. This was done at a series of fixed costs and a series of wind resources defined by the Weibull distribution parameters. The results indicated the following: At larger turbine sizes, (higher capital cost per turbine), the economics shifted toward a larger generator and smaller rotor (relatively). This exact relationship is dependent on the wind resource. At large turbine sizes, greater flexibility is shown in optimum generator sizing vs. rotor sizing. Having multiple generator size options for the same rotor size allows developers to more closely match and capitalize on the characteristics of their wind resource. The end result of the research is a set of diagrams developers can use to select the best turbine based on economics for their wind resource. This provides an additional tool they can use to make their projects more cost effective.Copyright © 2007 by ASME

[1]  H. Glauert The elements of aerofoil and airscrew theory , 1926 .

[2]  John J. Davis,et al.  History and Archeology , 1973 .

[3]  Richard Shepherd Shevell,et al.  Fundamentals of Flight , 1983 .

[4]  Z. M. Salameh,et al.  Optimum windmill-site matching , 1992 .

[5]  K K Sasi,et al.  On the prediction of capacity factor and selection of size of wind electric generators- a study based on Indian sites , 1997 .

[6]  John David Anderson,et al.  Aircraft performance and design , 1998 .

[7]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Determination of the optimum site-matching wind turbine using risk-based capacity benefit factors , 1999 .

[8]  P. Giguere,et al.  Design of a Tapered and Twisted Blade for the NREL Combined Experiment Rotor , 1999 .

[9]  Mukund Patel,et al.  Wind and Solar Power Systems , 1999 .

[10]  Paul Gipe Wind Energy Basics: A Guide to Small and Micro Wind Systems , 1999 .

[11]  Suresh H. Jangamshetti,et al.  Optimum siting of wind turbine generators , 2001 .

[12]  Robert Harrison,et al.  Large Wind Turbines: Design and Economics , 2001 .

[13]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook , 2001 .

[14]  Dayton A. Griffin,et al.  WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 1-Composite Blades for 80- to 120-Meter Rotor , 2001 .

[15]  Peter Fuglsang,et al.  Site-Specific Design Optimization of 1.5–2.0 MW Wind Turbines , 2001 .

[16]  S.S. Venkata,et al.  Wind energy explained: Theory, Design, and application [Book Review] , 2003, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[17]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Wind turbine generator trends for site‐specific tailoring , 2005 .

[18]  James Tangler,et al.  Wind Turbine Post-Stall Airfoil Performance Characteristics Guidelines for Blade-Element Momentum Methods: Preprint , 2005 .

[19]  Trevor J. Kenchington,et al.  Book Review: Ship: The Epic Story of Maritime Adventure , 2005 .

[20]  Earl P. N. Duque,et al.  Peak and Post-Peak Power Aerodynamics from Phase VI NASA Ames Wind Turbine Data , 2005 .

[21]  S. Maithel Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy , 2008 .