Evaluation of proper sensor position for classification of sheep behaviour through accelerometers

Abstract Automated classification and identification of feeding behaviour through sensors, has the potential to allow improvements in animal health and welfare. Sensor position, as well as epoch setting of segmented signal data, affects classification accuracy in behavioural activity discrimination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of position, at different time epoch setting, of a tri-axial accelerometer-based device (BEHARUM) on the classification of behaviour types such as grazing, ruminating and other activities in sheep grazing a chicory-based sward. Sheep were video recorded, during accelerometer deployment, by fixed camera. Mean, variance and inverse coefficient of variation (i.e., mean/ standard deviation), of the raw acceleration data for each axis, as well as the resultant variance and inverse coefficient of variation values of the three axes, were calculated for the following positions: mouth, nape, collar and epoch settings: 5 s, 10 s, 30 s, 60 s, 120 s, 180 s, 300 s. Video recordings were coded manually assigning to each position and epoch the prevailing behaviour. Multivariate discriminant analysis (DA) was used to distinguish between the three behaviour types. To evaluate the performance of DA in discriminating the three activities, overall accuracy and Coehn’s k coefficient were calculated, based on the error distribution in assignment. Mouth position recorded the highest accuracies and Coehn’s k coefficient in 300 s time epoch setting (88 % and 0.8 respectively), as well as collar position (90 % and 0.8 respectively), while nape position showed the best performance in 180 and 300 s (80 % and 0.6 respectively). Overall, the best performance of DA was obtained using collar position in particular at 300 s time epoch.

[1]  Corrado Dimauro,et al.  Prediction of bite number and herbage intake by an accelerometer-based system in dairy sheep exposed to different forages during short-term grazing tests , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[2]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The measurement of interrater agreement , 2004 .

[3]  Corrado Dimauro,et al.  Automatic classification system for grazing, ruminating and resting behaviour of dairy sheep using a tri-axial accelerometer , 2017 .

[4]  Thomas Niesler,et al.  Animal-borne behaviour classification for sheep (Dohne Merino) and Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum and Diceros bicornis) , 2017, Animal Biotelemetry.

[5]  Elisabetta Riva,et al.  Monitoring feeding behaviour of dairy cows using accelerometers , 2016 .

[6]  Distinguishing Cattle Foraging Activities Using an Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitor , 2013 .

[7]  Mark Trotter,et al.  Categorising sheep activity using a tri-axial accelerometer , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[8]  Aaron Ingham,et al.  Cattle behaviour classification from collar, halter, and ear tag sensors , 2017 .

[9]  A. Mason,et al.  Automated monitoring of foraging behaviour in free ranging sheep grazing a biodiverse pasture , 2013, 2013 Seventh International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST).

[10]  Esmaeil S. Nadimi,et al.  Original paper: Energy generation for an ad hoc wireless sensor network-based monitoring system using animal head movement , 2011 .

[11]  M. J. Gibb,et al.  Animal grazing/intake terminology and definitions , 1997 .

[12]  V. H. Oddy,et al.  Using a three-axis accelerometer to identify and classify sheep behaviour at pasture , 2016 .

[13]  B. Efron Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[14]  Mark Trotter,et al.  Identifying Sheep Activity from Tri-Axial Acceleration Signals Using a Moving Window Classification Model , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Mark Trotter,et al.  Behaviour classification of extensively grazed sheep using machine learning , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[16]  P. Penning,et al.  Measuring animal performance. , 2000 .

[17]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas Niesler,et al.  Automatic classification of sheep behaviour using 3-axis accelerometer data , 2015 .

[19]  D Berckmans,et al.  Lameness detection based on multivariate continuous sensing of milk yield, rumination, and neck activity. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  Mark Trotter,et al.  Predicting Lameness in Sheep Activity Using Tri-Axial Acceleration Signals , 2018, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[21]  Andreas Buerkert,et al.  Use of a tri-axial accelerometer for automated recording and classification of goats' grazing behaviour , 2009 .

[22]  David G. Renter,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional accelerometers to monitor and classify behavior patterns in cattle , 2009 .

[23]  K. McLennan,et al.  Technical note: Validation of an automatic recording system to assess behavioural activity level in sheep (Ovis aries) , 2015 .

[24]  M. Decandia,et al.  The effect of different time epoch settings on the classification of sheep behaviour using tri-axial accelerometry , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[25]  J. P. Holland,et al.  An automated sensor-based method of simple behavioural classification of sheep in extensive systems , 2008 .

[26]  D. Massart,et al.  The Mahalanobis distance , 2000 .

[27]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Classification of behaviour in housed dairy cows using an accelerometer-based activity monitoring system , 2015, Animal Biotelemetry.

[28]  Anthony Winterlich,et al.  Evaluation of sampling frequency, window size and sensor position for classification of sheep behaviour , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[29]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[30]  E. Fogarty,et al.  Can accelerometer ear tags identify behavioural changes in sheep associated with parturition? , 2020, Animal reproduction science.

[31]  Kensuke Kawamura,et al.  Development of an automatic classification system for eating, ruminating and resting behavior of cattle using an accelerometer , 2008 .

[32]  Keith A. Ellis,et al.  Feature Selection and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Classification of Grazing and Rumination Behaviour in Sheep , 2018, Sensors.