A Basic Water Quality Model for the River Neckar: Part 1 – model development, parameter sensitivity and identifiability, calibration and validation

In order to simulate and forecast dissolved oxygen (DO) in the central part of River Neckar, we developed a Basic Water Quality Model (BWQM). The present paper gives a comprehensive description of model development, model structure along with the governing equations, sensitivity and identifiability analyses as well as calibration and validation. The development of BWQM was guided by two major restrictions: it has to account for all relevant processes affecting DO, and it should only be based on readily available data and system knowledge. These restrictions led to a model, calculating nine state variables, including DO, phytoplankton, nutrients, and biochemical oxygen demand. However, due to limited data, the representation of phytoplankton is quite simple. A local sensitivity analysis led to a subset of five parameters, which are much more sensitive than the 22 other parameters. These five parameters are all closely connected with phytoplankton dynamics, highlighting the importance of phytoplankton for the DO budget. On the basis of an a priori identifiability analysis, four out of the five most sensitive parameters were chosen for model calibration. The calibrated model performed well in simulating DO and phytoplankton. Given the data availability and the present state of system knowledge, BWQM comes close to representing the optimal model with respect to predicting DO and phytoplankton.

[1]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression , 1991 .

[2]  John S. Gulliver,et al.  Indexing Gas Transfer in Self-Aerated Flows , 1990 .

[3]  Steven C. McCutcheon,et al.  Water Quality Modeling , 2006 .

[4]  H. Künsch,et al.  Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models , 2001 .

[5]  Pavel Novák,et al.  Oxygen Transfer at Hydraulic Structures , 1978 .

[6]  S. Effler,et al.  River dissolved oxygen model with zebra mussel oxygen demand (ZOD) , 2001 .

[7]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[8]  Hesong Hua Accurate Method for Calculation of Saturation DO , 1990 .

[9]  M. Welker,et al.  Can mussels control the plankton in rivers?—a planktological approach applying a Lagrangian sampling strategy , 1998 .

[10]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[11]  I. Haag A Basic Water Quality Model for the River Neckar: Part 2 -model-based analysis of the oxygen budget and scenarios , 2006 .

[12]  P Reichert,et al.  River Water Quality Model no. 1 (RWQM1): III. Biochemical submodel selection. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  H. Fischer Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters , 1979 .

[14]  D. D. Toro,et al.  Optics of turbid estuarine waters: Approximations and applications , 1978 .

[15]  P. Reichert,et al.  Identifiability and uncertainty analysis of the river water quality model no. 1 (RWQM1). , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  P Reichert,et al.  River Water Quality Model no. 1 (RWQM1): II. Biochemical process equations. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  P. Reichert,et al.  Biogeochemical model of Lake Zürich : sensitivity, identifiability and uncertainty analysis , 2001 .

[18]  Bernhard Westrich,et al.  Processes governing river water quality identified by principal component analysis , 2002 .

[19]  F. Schöll,et al.  Modelling the Chlorophyll a Content of the River Rhine - Interrelation between Riverine Algal Production and Population Biomass of Grazers, Rotifers and the Zebra Mussel, Dreissena polymorpha , 2002 .